Abstract
AbstractThis study explores the relationship between air pollution and judicial rulings. Although environmental factors should not affect judicial decisions, realists contend that there is substantial room for external factors to transpire into sentencing and sway human reasoning. We hypothesize that air pollution is one of these factors. Using Poisson panel models and instrumental variable techniques, we show that exposure leads to more convictions. We posit that this effect occurs because the impact of exposure on the central nervous system changes the cognitive performance and empathy of judges. Back-of-the-envelope calculations suggest that decreasing average air pollution in India by one standard deviation would lead to up to 145,000 fewer convictions regarding currently active cases.
Funder
H2020 European Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Economics and Econometrics
Reference168 articles.
1. Aguilar-Gomez S, Dwyer H, Graff Zivin J, Neidell M (2022) This is air: the “non-health” effects of air pollution. Ann Rev Resour Econ 14:403–425
2. Aiken J, Shalleck A, Mertz E, Macaulay S, Mitchell T (2016) Putting the “real world” into traditional classroom teaching. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
3. Air Quality Life Index (2022) Particulate air pollution is the single greatest threat to human health globally. URL https://aqli.epic.uchicago.edu/pollution-facts/.
4. Alesina A, La Ferrara E (2014) A test of racial bias in capital sentencing. Am Econ Rev 104(11):3397–3433
5. Aletras N, Tsarapatsanis D, Preoţiuc-Pietro D, Lampos V (2016) Predicting judicial decisions of the European court of human rights: a natural language processing perspective. PeerJ Comput Sci 2:e93
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献