Author:
Bateman I. J.,Brouwer R.,Ferrini S.,Schaafsma M.,Barton D. N.,Dubgaard A.,Hasler B.,Hime S.,Liekens I.,Navrud S.,De Nocker L.,Ščeponavičiūtė R.,Semėnienė D.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Economics and Econometrics
Reference61 articles.
1. Amiran EY, Hagen DA (2010) The scope trials: variation in sensitivity to scope and WTP with directionally bounded utility functions. J Environ Econ Manag 59: 293–301. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2009.06.003
2. Arrow K, Solow R, Portney PR, Leamer EE, Radner R, Schuman H (1993) Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Fed Reg 58(1993): 4601–4614
3. Banerjee S, Murphy JH (2005) The scope test revisited. Appl Econ Lett 12(10): 613–617
4. Barton DN (2002) The transferability of benefit transfer: contingent valuation of water quality improvements in Costa Rica. Ecol Econ 42: 147–164
5. Bateman IJ, Langford IH, Turner RK, Willis KG, Garrod GD (1995) Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies. Ecol Econ 12(2): 161–179. doi: 10.1016/0921-8009(94)00044-V
Cited by
183 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献