Fostering Hope and Acknowledging Uncertainty: Meeting Parents’ Needs and Preferences When Communicating Prognosis in Genetic Neurodevelopmental Conditions

Author:

Turbitt Erin,Callinan Elizabeth,Shakes Pieta,McEwen Alison,Amor David J.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose of Review We sought to summarise recent research on prognostication in genetic neurodevelopmental conditions, focusing on parent preferences for prognostic conversations. We further aimed to explore recommendations about communicating children’s prognoses with parents at the time of diagnosis and beyond. Recent Findings Our review revealed growing research on prognostic conversations in oncology settings and for conditions that are life-limiting; however, there remains little research in the context of genetic neurodevelopmental conditions. The literature indicates a shift from censoring prognosis towards open discussions emphasising predicted challenges and abilities. The little research that has been done shows that parents seek prognosis discussions tailored to their preferences, relating to the timing, depth, and mode of delivery of information. Divergent perspectives between parents and healthcare professionals complicate prognostic communication and may relate to the stance of the healthcare professional (such as preconceived views and biases), and gaps in their training or within evidence-based interventions. Summary There is a need for personalised, sensitive approaches to prognostic conversations with parents and to address societal biases that influence the stance and behaviours of healthcare professionals in those conversations. Future research should prioritise understanding that parental needs are diverse, improving communication strategies, and expanding information modalities. Focus should also be on reflexively identifying healthcare professional and societal stereotypical views on disability, mitigating biases for effective prognostic discussions with parents regarding genetic neurodevelopmental conditions.

Funder

University of Technology Sydney

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3