Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference5 articles.
1. McDonald L, Schultze A, Carroll R, Ramagopalan SV. Performing studies using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink: to link or not to link? Eur J Epidemiol. 2018;33(6):601–5.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-018-0389-5
.
2. Boggon R, van Staa TP, Chapman M, Gallagher AM, Hammad TA, Richards MA. Cancer recording and mortality in the General Practice Research Database and linked cancer registries. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013;22(2):168–75.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.3374
.
3. Ranopa M, Douglas I, van Staa T, et al. The identification of incident cancers in UK primary care databases: a systematic review. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015;24(1):11–8.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.3729
.
4. Dregan A, Moller H, Murray-Thomas T, Gulliford MC. Validity of cancer diagnosis in a primary care database compared with linked cancer registrations in England. Population-based cohort study. Cancer Epidemiol. 2012;36(5):425–9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2012.05.013
.
5. National Collaborating Centre for Cancer. Suspected cancer: recognition and referral. NICE Guideline. Full guideline. Final version. Commissioned by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Cardiff: National Collaborating Centre for Cancer; 2015.