Abstract
AbstractIntertemporal preference reversals occur when individuals choose future option A over future option B in a direct choice between the two but place a higher ‘immediate cash’ value on B than on A. Tversky et al. (1990) reported strong evidence of such reversals, which they attributed mainly to valuation biases rather than intransitivity. We find similar levels of reversals, even after adjusting for considerable degrees of variability and imprecision in people’s responses. However, we disagree with Tversky et al.’s conclusions about the causes of the majority of these reversals. We find substantial levels of intransitivity in respondents’ binary choices as well as differential overvaluation of both options relative to the values inferred from their choices.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference18 articles.
1. Becker, G. M., DeGroot, M. H., & Marschak, J. (1964). Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 9(3), 226–232.
2. Blavatskyy, P. R., & Maafi, H. (2018). Estimating representations of time preferences and models of probabilistic intertemporal choice on experimental data. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 56(3), 259–287.
3. Butler, D. J., & Loomes, G. C. (2007). Imprecision as an account of the preference reversal phenomenon. American Economic Review, 97(1), 277–297.
4. Cheung, S. (2015). Risk preferences are not time preferences: On the elicitation of time preference under conditions of risk: Comment. American Economic Review, 105(7), 2242–2260.
5. Freeman, D., Manzini, P., Mariotti, M., & Mittone, L. (2016). Procedures for eliciting time preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 126, 235–242.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献