Author:
Charness Gary,Garcia Thomas,Offerman Theo,Villeval Marie Claire
Abstract
AbstractWe consider the external validity of laboratory measures of risk attitude. Based on a large-scale experiment using a representative panel of the Dutch population, we test if these measures can explain two different types of behavior: (i) behavior in laboratory risky financial decisions, and (ii) behavior in naturally-occurring field behavior under risk (financial, health and employment decisions). We find that measures of risk attitude are related to behavior in laboratory financial decisions and the most complex measures are outperformed by simpler measures. However, measures of risk attitude are not related to risk-taking in the field, calling into question the methods currently used for the purpose of measuring actual risk preferences. We conclude that while the external validity of measures of risk attitude holds in closely related frameworks, this validity is compromised in more remote settings.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting
Reference69 articles.
1. Andersen, S., Harrison, G.W., Lau, M.I., & Rutström, E.E. (2008). Eliciting risk and time preferences. Econometrica, 76(3), 583–618.
2. Andersen, S., Girolamo, A., & Harrison, G. (2014). Risk and time preferences of entrepreneurs: Evidence from a Danish field experiment. Theory and Decision, 77(3), 341–357.
3. Andreoni, J., & Harbaugh, W. (2009). Unexpected utility: Experimental tests of five key questions about preferences over risk. Working Paper University of Oregon, Dept of Economics.
4. Barseghyan, L., Molinari, F., O’Donoghue, T., & Teitelbaum, J.C. (2013). The nature of risk preferences: Evidence from insurance choices. American Economic Review, 103(6), 2499–2529.
5. Binswanger, H.P. (1980). Attitudes toward risk: Experimental measurement in rural India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62(3), 395–407.
Cited by
84 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献