Author:
Jacqmin Didier,Roy Catherine
Reference8 articles.
1. Amendola MA, Bree RL, Pollack HM et al. (1988) Small renal cell carcinoma: resolving a diagnostic dilemma. Radiology 166: 637–641.
2. Frohmuller HG, Grups JW, Heller V (1987) Comparative value of ultrasonography, cumputerized tomography, angiography and excretory urography in the staging of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 138: 482–484.
3. Veda T, Nishitani H, Kudo H (1988) Comparison of angiogrpahy and computed tomography using new morphologic criteria in staging of renal cell carcinoma. Urology 32: 439–464.
4. Weyman PJ, McClennan BL, Stanley RJ, Levitt RG, Saget SS (1980) Comparison of computed tomography and angiography in the evaluation of renal cell carcinoma. Radiology 133:417–424.
5. Roy C, Tuchmann C, Morel M et al. (1999) Is there still a place for angiography in the management of renal mass lesions? Eur Radiol 9: 329–335.