Abstract
Abstract
Background
Consumer wearables and smartphone devices commonly offer an estimate of energy expenditure (EE) to assist in the objective monitoring of physical activity to the general population. Alongside consumers, healthcare professionals and researchers are seeking to utilise these devices for the monitoring of training and improving human health. However, the methods of validation and reporting of EE estimation in these devices lacks rigour, negatively impacting on the ability to make comparisons between devices and provide transparent accuracy.
Objectives
The Towards Intelligent Health and Well-Being Network of Physical Activity Assessment (INTERLIVE) is a joint European initiative of six universities and one industrial partner. The network was founded in 2019 and strives towards developing best-practice recommendations for evaluating the validity of consumer wearables and smartphones. This expert statement presents a best-practice validation protocol for consumer wearables and smartphones in the estimation of EE.
Methods
The recommendations were developed through (1) a systematic literature review; (2) an unstructured review of the wider literature discussing the potential factors that may introduce bias during validation studies; and (3) evidence-informed expert opinions from members of the INTERLIVE network.
Results
The systematic literature review process identified 1645 potential articles, of which 62 were deemed eligible for the final dataset. Based on these studies and the wider literature search, a validation framework is proposed encompassing six key domains for validation: the target population, criterion measure, index measure, testing conditions, data processing and the statistical analysis.
Conclusions
The INTERLIVE network recommends that the proposed protocol, and checklists provided, are used to standardise the testing and reporting of the validation of any consumer wearable or smartphone device to estimate EE. This in turn will maximise the potential utility of these technologies for clinicians, researchers, consumers, and manufacturers/developers, while ensuring transparency, comparability, and replicability in validation.
Trial Registration
PROSPERO ID: CRD42021223508.
Funder
huawei technologies
University College Dublin
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Reference71 articles.
1. Tankovska H. Fitness Trackers—Statistics and Facts. Statista; 2020. https://www.statista.com/topics/4393/fitness-and-activity-tracker/. Accessed 24 Feb 2021.
2. O’Dea S. Smartphone users worldwide 2016–2021. Statista; 2020. https://www.statista.com/statistics/330695/number-of-smartphone-users-worldwide/. Accessed 24 Feb 2021.
3. Bunn JA, Navalta JW, Fountaine CJ, et al. Current state of commercial wearable technology in physical activity monitoring 2015–2017. Int J Exerc Sci. 2018;11:503–15.
4. de Weir VJB. New methods for calculating metabolic rate with special reference to protein metabolism. J Physiol. 1949;109:1–9.
5. Levine JA. Measurement of energy expenditure. Public Health Nutr. 2005;8:1123–32.
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献