Determining sensitivity and specificity of risk scores for QTc interval prolongation in hemato-oncology patients prescribed systemic antifungal therapy: a retrospective cross-sectional study

Abstract

Abstract Background QTc interval prolongation can result in potentially lethal arrhythmias. One risk factor is QTc-prolonging drugs, including some antifungals often used in hemato-oncology patients. Screening tools for patients at risk have not yet been investigated in this patient population. Aim Our aim was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of five QTc risk scores in hemato-oncology patients receiving systemic antifungal therapy. Method Data were retrieved from an internal study database including adult hemato-oncology patients prescribed systemic antifungal therapy. Data on QTc-prolonging medication, risk factors for QTc prolongation, and electrocardiograms (ECG) were collected retrospectively for a period of 12 months. The QTc risk scores according to Tisdale, Vandael, Berger, Bindraban, and Aboujaoude as well as their sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Results During the evaluated period, 77 patients were prescribed systemic antifungals resulting in 187 therapy episodes. Regarding therapy episodes, median age was 56 years (IQR 44–68), 41% (77) were female, and a median of 3 QTc-prolonging drugs were prescribed (range 0–6). ECGs were available for 45 (24%) of the therapy episodes 3–11 days after initiation of the antifungal therapy, 22 of which showed QTc prolongation. Regarding these 45 therapy episodes, sensitivity and specificity of the risk scores were calculated as follows: Tisdale 86%/22%, Vandael 91%/35%, Berger 32%/83%, Bindraban 50%/78%, Aboujaoude 14%/87%. Conclusion The QTc risk scores according to Tisdale and Vandael showed sufficient sensitivity for risk stratification in the studied patient population. In contrast, risk scores according to Berger, Bindraban, and Aboujaoude cannot be considered suitable due to poor sensitivity.