A course-based approach to conducting program review

Author:

Hoare Alana,Dishke Hondzel Catharine,Wagner Shannon,Church Shelley

Abstract

AbstractExternal program review is often considered the “gold standard” approach to evaluating academic programs in higher education. Despite the importance of program review, skepticism persists regarding its ability to meaningfully engage faculty and have sustaining impact on program improvement. This paper builds on the academic Program Review Learning Community conceptual model and presents a process for applying a project management facilitation technique that leverages a course structure. The Program Review Course allows for multiple programs to be reviewed concurrently as part of an interdisciplinary cohort. Within the cohort, faculty teams gain access to templates, information sessions, workshops, and discussion forums, with opportunities for engagement both within and across multiple disciplines. Using learning modules, this approach is designed to create efficiency and collaboration in delivering program review tools and customized supports. Utilizing a course structure for program review fits well with a new way to think about program review because successful learning communities are often embedded within institutional structures. Use of this approach is expected to increase clarity and consistency, improve administrative feasibility, provide guidance for those new to program review, promote collegiality within and across programs, and involve team members in the creation of action planning. The authors propose that a course-based approach for conducting program review, with teams of disciplinary faculty joining an interdisciplinary cohort and supported by quality assurance practitioners and educational developers is a novel way to provide structure and academic development while meeting legislative requirements.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference43 articles.

1. Armstrong AJ, Holmes CM, Henning D. A changing world, again. How appreciative Inquiry can guide our growth. Soc Sci Hum Open. 2020;2(1):100038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100038.

2. Banta TW, Jones EA, Black KE. Designing effective assessment: principles and profiles of good practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2009.

3. Barak RJ, Sweeney JD. Academic program review in planning, budgeting, and assessment. New Dir Inst Res. 1995;86:3–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.37019958602.

4. Bentrim EM. The Impact of sense of belonging in college: implications for student persistence, retention, and success. Sterling: Stylus Publishing; 2022.

5. Berger PL, Luckman T. The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, New York, NY: Anchor Books; 1966.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3