1. Abumrad, J. (2019). The miseducation of Larry P. [Audio podcast episode]. Radiolab. WNYC New York. https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/radiolab/articles/g-miseducation-larry-p
2. American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California. (2016). The right to remain a student: how California school policies fail to protect and serve. https://www.aclunc.org/publications/right-remain-student-how-ca-school-policies-fail-protect-and-serve
3. Bradshaw, C. P., Pas, E. T., Bottiani, J. H., Debnam, K. J., Reinke, W. M., Herman, K. C., & Rosenberg, M. S. (2018). Promoting cultural responsivity and student engagement through double check coaching of classroom teachers: an efficacy study. School Psychology Review, 47(2), 118–134. https://doi.org/10.17105/spr-2017-0119.v47-2.
4. Burns, M. K. (2016). Effect of cognitive processing assessments and interventions on academic outcomes: can 200 studies be wrong? Communique, 44(5), 10–26.
5. California Department of Education (1992). Legal advisory: analysis of Judge Peckham’s August 31, 1992 decision in Larry P. v. Riles and Crawford v. Honig. https://casponline.org/pdfs/publications/larryp/4.%20California%20Dept.%20of%20Ed.%20legal%20advisory%201992.pdf