Abstract
AbstractTo explain the presence and spatial distribution of NO3− and N–NH3 in the Aquifer of the Metropolitan Area of Mexico City (AMAMC), a hydrogeochemical and isotopic analysis using 13CDIC (as well as the stable isotopes 18O and 2H) in groundwater was conducted. This aquifer is located in an old closed lacustrine volcano-sedimentary basin; some wells hosted in the semi-confined zone contain high N–NH3 concentrations, while others present NO3− contents in the recharge zones (hosted in an oxidizing environment). In this study, a change in the isotopic signature (primarily in 18O and 2H) was observed from the recharge zones to the basin center in some of the wells with high NO3− concentrations, this behavior can be attributed to evaporation during the incorporation of recently infiltrated water. In addition, the results for 13C (along with 2H) in wells with the highest N–NH3 concentrations exhibited an atypically broad range of values. Results indicated the occurrence of hydrogeochemical and/or biochemical processes in the aquifer (in an oxidizing or reducing environment), such as organic degradation, bacterial decomposition (primarily in the ancient Lake Texcoco and which acts as a natural sink for carbon, nitrogen, sulfur, and phosphorus), besides rock weathering and dissolution, which may be responsible for a very marked isotopic modification of the 13C (and, to a lesser extent, 2H). Methanotrophic bacterial activity and methanogenic activity may be related to N–NH3 removal processes by oxidation and residual water incorporation respectively, whereas the increase in the NO3− content in some wells is due to the recent contribution of poor-quality water due to contamination.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference72 articles.
1. Akbar H, Timothy JK, Jagadish TM, Golam M, Apurbo KC, Muhammad F, Rajan B, Fahad S, Hasanuzzaman M (2020) Agricultural land degradation: processes and problems undermining future food security. In: Fahad S, Hasanuzzaman M, Alam M, Ullah H,Saeed M, Khan AK, Adnan M (Ed.), Environment, Climate, plant and vegetation growth. Springer Publ Ltd, Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature. pp 17–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49732-3
2. Apelo CAJ, Postma D (2005) Geochemistry, groundwater and pollution (2nd edn.) pp 137–142. Amsterdam: A.A. Balkema Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439833544
3. APHA, AWWA, WWF (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American public health association, the American water works association, Association water environment federation, Washington, D.C.
4. Arce J.L., Layer P. W., Macías J. L., Morales-Casique E., García-Palomo A., Jiménez-Domínguez F. J., Benowitz J., Vásquez-Serrano A. 2019 Geology and stratigraphy of the Mexico Basin (Mexico City), central Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt, Journal of Maps, 15(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2019.1593251
5. Armienta MA, Rodríguez R, Ceniceros N, Cruz O, Aguayo A, Morales P, Cienfuegos E (2014) Groundwater quality andeotermall energy. The case of cerro prieto geothermal field Mexico. Renew Energy 64:236–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.09.018