Non-Expected Utility: What do the Anomalies Mean for Risk in Agriculture?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Non-Expected Utility: What do the Anomalies Mean for Risk in Agriculture?

Published:2002 Issue: Volume: Page:21-40
ISSN:
Container-title:A Comprehensive Assessment of the Role of Risk in U.S. Agriculture
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Buschena David E.

Publisher

Springer US

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-1-4757-3583-3_2

Reference64 articles.

1. Allais, M. 1953. “Le Comportement de l’Homme Rationnel Devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de l’Ecole Américaine.” Econometrica 21: 503–546.

2. Allais, M. 1979. “The So-Called Allais Paradox and Rational Decisions Under Uncertainty.” In M. Allais and O. Hagen, eds., Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel.

3. Arrow, K. 1970. Essays in the Theory of Risk Bearing. Amsterdam: North Holland.

4. Atwood, J., and D.E. Buschena. 2000. “Evaluating the Magnitudes of Financial Transactions Costs on Risk Behavior.” Working Paper, Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics, Montana State University.

5. Atwood, J.A., M.J. Watts, and A. Baquet. 1996. “An Examination of the Effects of Price Supports and Federal Crop Insurance Upon the Economic Growth, Capital Structure, and Financial Survival of Wheat Growers in the Northern High Plains.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78: 212–224.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. 1Chapter 0 Step 6: Determining the Likelihood of Outcomes;Applied Risk Management in Agriculture;2009-10-20

2. Finding optimal price risk management instruments: the case of the Spanish potato sector;Agricultural Economics;2007-01

3. Consistency of risk premium measures;Agricultural Economics;2005-06-14