Aristocrats in Arbitration: Did Class Affect Inter-state Arbitration Before or After the 1899 Hague Peace Conference?

Author:

Fry James D.,Cheung Arthur L. W.,Michael Bryane

Abstract

AbstractThis article explores whether the aristocratic status of arbitrators or disputants affected the outcome of inter-state arbitrations either before or after the 1899 Hague Peace Conference. This article takes a longue durée approach to the topic by including all inter-state arbitrations between 1794 and 1989. The research shows a statistically significant relationship between respondent-appointed aristocratic arbitrators on a tribunal and the outcome against the aristocratic party, as well as a statistically significant relationship between no respondent-appointed aristocratic arbitrators and outcome in favor of the claimant, but only in inter-state arbitrations before the Conference for both of these relationships. This article brings into question whether aristocratic arbitrators from before the Conference were fully committed to the international rule of law. Moreover, it highlights how such arbitrators stopped making their decisions based on class after the Conference, which should reassure users of inter-state arbitration that worry about such biases.

Funder

University Grants Committee

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference89 articles.

1. Abbenhuis MM (2018) The Hague conferences and international politics, 1898–1915. Bloomsbury Publishing, London

2. Abbenhuis MM et al (2017) War, Peace and International Order?: The Legacies f the Hague Conferences of 1899 and 1907. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315447803

3. Abi-Saab G (2010) The normalization of international adjudication: convergence and divergencies. NYU J Int Law Pol 43:1–14

4. Alford RP (2008) The nobel effect: nobel peace prize laureates as international norm entrepreneurs. Virginia J Int Law 49:61–153

5. Amrhein V et al (2019) Scientists rise up against statistical significance. Nature 567:305–307. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-00857-9

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3