EU Lawlessness Law at the EU-Belarusian Border: Torture and Dehumanisation Excused by ‘Instrumentalisation’

Author:

Ganty Sarah,Ancite-Jepifánova Aleksandra,Kochenov Dimitry V.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis paper engages with the routine normalisation of mass violations of human rights at the EU–Belarusian border. The direct and indirect victimisation of the racialised ‘other’ on the Eastern border of the Union is a direct extension of the EU-sponsored war on the racialised passport-poor in the Mediterranean. Together, the two form one clear and coherent picture of flagrant mass rights abuse. This EU law approach has claimed more than 27,000 lives over the last eight years and left more than 120,000 innocent people captured and imprisoned, or enslaved and sold for ransom by the criminal proxies enlisted by the EU and its Member States. This dramatic situation has not arisen by chance. An array of legal techniques is deployed by the EU, specifically by FRONTEX, the European Commission and, albeit incidentally and to a lesser extent, the European Court of Justice—to make sure that the full brunt of the denial of the right to life and other vital rights of non-citizens is never presented as a violation of EU law. We call these legal techniques ‘EU lawlessness law’. Focusing on the situation at the EU–Belarusian border allows us to zoom in on the bespoke lawlessness solutions crafted and deployed there by the EU and its Member States. The gross violations of the law are rhetorically justified by the alleged instrumentalisation of migrants by the dictatorial Belarusian regime. Paradoxically, the latter emerges as a de facto partner of the EU and its Member States, in torturing numerous people in complete disregard of any of the legal guarantees that the Union professes to provide.

Funder

Central European University Private University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference155 articles.

1. Achiume ET (2021a) Digital racial borders. AJIL 115:333–338

2. Achiume ET (2021b) Racial borders. Geo LJ 110:445–508

3. Amnesty International (2021a) Belarus/EU: New Evidence of Brutal Violence from Belarusian Forces against Asylum-Seekers and Migrants Facing Pushbacks from the EU. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2021/12/belarus-eu-new-evidence-of-brutal-violence-from-belarusian-forces-against-asylum-seekers-and-migrants-facing-pushbacks-from-the-eu/#:~:text=Asylum%20seekers%20and%20migrants%20trying,new%20evidence%20gathered%20by%20Amnesty. Accessed 14 July 2024

4. Amnesty International (2021b) Greece: Violence, Lies, and Pushbacks—Refugee and Migrants Still Denied Safety and Asylum at Europe’s Borders. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/eur25/4307/2021/en/. Accessed 14 July 2024

5. Amnesty International (2022a) Latvia: Return Home or Never Leave the Woods, Refugees and Migrants Arbitrarily Detained, Beaten and Coerced Into “Voluntary” Returns. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/eur52/5913/2022/en/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3