Abstract
AbstractLivestock farming, which produces milk and meat, is practised by nearly all cultures. But in addition to this, grazing livestock fulfils other fundamentally important roles, one of which is the maintenance of open landscapes, which in turn provides habitat for many rare plant and animal species. Whether wild large herbivores, such as red deer (Cervus elaphus), benefit from the management of the open landscapes is unknown, and there are conflicting views on the nature of the interaction between livestock and wildlife. To investigate this question, we studied interactions in space and time between red deer and livestock in an 787 ha fenced pasture in eastern Germany. First, we used faecal pellet counts to determine whether red deer were using the fenced pasture and whether livestock were using the entire available pasture. Second, we fitted ten red deer, as well as eight Konik horses (Equus ferus caballus) and eight Heck cattle (Bos taurus) with GPS-collars. These data allowed us to perform analyses of space–time interactions. The faecal pellet data showed that red deer did indeed use the fenced pasture and that livestock used the entire extent of the pasture. Further, we verified a neutral space–time interaction between red deer and livestock within the pasture. Thus, there was no indication of a negative effect of the presence of livestock on red deer inside the pasture. For these reasons, we recommend that low-intensity grazing by cattle and horses can maintain open landscapes without detrimental effects on the use of the area by red deer.
Funder
Natural Heritage branch, Naturerbe GmbH
Hochschule für nachhaltige Entwicklung Eberswalde
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference53 articles.
1. Archibald S, Bond WJ, Stock WD, Fairbanks DHK (2005) Shaping the landscape: fire-grazer interactions in an African Savanna. Ecol Appl 15:96–109. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-5210
2. Austin DD, Urness PJ (1986) Effects of cattle grazing on mule deer diet and area selection. Rangel Ecol Manag/J Range Manag Archives 39:18–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/3899678
3. Bakker JP, De Bie S, Dallinga JH, Tjaden P, De Vries Y (1983) Sheep-grazing as a management tool for heathland conservation and regeneration in the Netherlands. J Appl Ecol 20:541–560. https://doi.org/10.2307/2403525
4. Bakker JF, de Jonge VN (1998) Hoe veilig is de Eems-Dollard? Ontwikkelingen in enkele belangrijke verontreinigende stoffen. In: Het Eems-Dollard estuarium: interacties tussen menselijke beinvloeding en natuurlijke dynamiek (eds. K. Essink and P. Esselink), pp. 47–60. Report RIKZ-98.020, Haren
5. Bakker JP, van Diggelen R (2006) Restoration of dry grasslands and heathlands, pp. 95–110 in: Restor Ecol: the new frontier / Jelte van Andel and James Aronson (editors). Blackwell Science Ltd UK