Abstract
AbstractHunting directly impacts the population dynamics of ungulates and can have a significant effect on the quality of phenotypic traits such as horns or antlers. In Poland, following a demographic collapse in the 1990s and the introduction of a hunting ban in 2001, the population of moose (Alces alces) has increased from 1,800 to over 20,000 individuals, recolonising its former range. As the moose is a charismatic species and a popular subject for nature photography, we analysed changes in antler size and shape in this cervid between 2005 and 2021 based on photos of male moose and antler casts provided by photographers or available in social media. Our findings indicate that during the hunting ban, the probability of observing the cervina antler type significantly decreased over time, from 47% in 2012 to 28% in 2021. Meanwhile, the probability of observing the intermediate and palmate antler types significantly increased from 44 to 53% and from 9 to 19%, respectively. The mean number of tines significantly increased from 3.2 in 2005 to 4.7 in 2021, and the antler size index significantly increased from 3.4 to 3.9. The most likely mechanism behind the observed changes could be the ageing of a population released from hunting pressure. We also observed regional variation in antler size, which is likely related to differences in environmental conditions. Our study serves as an example of how passive citizen science can contribute to our understanding of ecological trends and the quantification of population patterns. It also has important implications for management of species affected by trophy hunting.
Funder
Instytut Biologii Ssaków Polskiej Akademii Nauk
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference70 articles.
1. Adach S, Wojtkowska M, Religa P (2023) Consequences of the accessibility of the mountain national parks in Poland. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:27483–27500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24197-w
2. Allendorf FW, Hard JJ (2009) Human-induced evolution caused by unnatural selection through harvest of wild animals. PNAS 106(1):9987–9994. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901069106
3. Balčiauskas L, Varanauskas R, Bukelskis E (2017) Impact of selective hunting on the trophy size of roe deer: Baltic example. North West J Zool 13:118–127
4. Bergeron P, Festa-Bianchet M, Von Hardenberg A, Bassano B (2008) Heterogeneity in male horn growth and longevity in a highly sexually dimorphic ungulate. Oikos 117:77–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.16158.x
5. Bobek B, Merta D, Sułkowski P, Siuta A (2005) A moose recovery plan for Poland: main objectives and tasks. Alces 41:129–138