A Japanese multicenter comparison of iotrolan 280 with iopamidol 300 in intravenous urography-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A Japanese multicenter comparison of iotrolan 280 with iopamidol 300 in intravenous urography

Published:1995-04 Issue:S2 Volume:5 Page:S58-S62
ISSN:0938-7994
Container-title:European Radiology
language:en
Short-container-title:Eur. Radiol.

Author:

Narimatsu Y.,Hiramatsu K.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF02343263.pdf

Reference4 articles.

1. Inoue S, Watanabe T, Yamamura H (1986) Visualization, safety and clinical value of iotrolan in lumbar myelography. J Clin Exp Med 139: 635–644

2. Dure-Smith P, Simenhoff M, Zimskind PD, Kordoff M (1971) The bolus effect in excretory urography. Radiology 101: 29–34

3. Tsubogo Y (1985) Excretory urography: new contrast media. Jpn J Diagn Imag 5 (suppl 1):79–83

4. Tokunaga A, Shigematsu K, Mitomo S, Uchida H, Matsuo N, Ishida O, et al. (1984) Clinical study of iopamidol in excretory urography: multicentered comparative study with diatrizoate. Radiol Med 3: 200–213

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Current iodinated contrast media;European Radiology;2001-03-28

2. Comparison between the efficacy of dimeric and monomeric non-ionic contrast media (iodixanol vs iopromide) in urography in patients with mild to moderate renal insufficiency.;The British Journal of Radiology;1998-09

3. Urography into the 21st century: new contrast media, renal handling, imaging characteristics, and nephrotoxicity.;Radiology;1997-08

4. Future Directions – Contrast Media;Imaging in Oncological Urology