Abstract
AbstractTwo critical theories—both contemporaneous and complementary—in Western philosophy of education spanning the 1960s to the 1980s will first be explicated, and then their significant intellectual values will be discussed on the basis of such a comparative account. These two critical models are the practical theory of education in the Anglophone world (typically in the UK) and the critical theory of education in the Continental Germany. I will introduce them—namely, analytic practical educational theory and German critical pädagogik—one after another, by focusing on their complementary differences, involving characteristic rationalities, typical forms of criticism, corresponding ways of exercising criticalities, and frames of reference regarding the sources of their criticalities. Based on such distinctions and contrasts, I will in the final section argue for their inherent value of coexistence, their practical value in illustrating the unique construction of academic educational studies which has respectively developed in the Anglo-American world and in the Continental world. As an additional point about their epistemic value to understand educational knowledge and scholarship accumulated in the West, I will further argue that these two philosophical–critical theories of education in parallel constitute peak academic experiences. This is mainly because they are compelling evidence, demonstrating how differently yet legitimately the two camps of Western educational scholarships deal with the same issue of criticality in contrasting yet complementary ways.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference46 articles.
1. Benner, D. 1999. On the relationship between education and critique and the limitations of various sorts of Critical Pedagogies [教育学与批判──对各种批判教育科学思想的局限性及问题关系的思考]. (Trans by Q.L. Li and Z.M. Peng). Journal of East China Normal University (Education Sciences) [华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)] 2: 31–43.
2. Benner, D., and A. English. 2004. Critique and negativity: Towards the pluralisation of critique in educational practice, theory and research. Journal of Philosophy of Education 38: 409–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0309-8249.2004.00394.x.
3. Biesta, G. 2005. What can critical pedagogy learn from postmodernism? Further reflections on the impossible future of critical pedagogy. In Critical theory and critical pedagogy today: Toward a new critical language in education, ed. I. Gur-Zeʼev. Haifa: University of Haifa, Faculty of Education.
4. Biesta, G. 2011. Disciplines and theory in the academic study of education: A comparative analysis of the Anglo-American and Continental construction of the field. Pedagogy, Culture & Society 19(2): 175–192.
5. Burbules, N.C. 1992. Forms of ideology-critique: A pedagogical perspective. Qualitative Studies in Education 5(1): 7–17.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献