Analytic Practical Theory of Education and German Critical Pädagogik: Comparing Their Critical Dimension

Author:

Wei Flora Liuying

Abstract

AbstractTwo critical theories—both contemporaneous and complementary—in Western philosophy of education spanning the 1960s to the 1980s will first be explicated, and then their significant intellectual values will be discussed on the basis of such a comparative account. These two critical models are the practical theory of education in the Anglophone world (typically in the UK) and the critical theory of education in the Continental Germany. I will introduce them—namely, analytic practical educational theory and German critical pädagogik—one after another, by focusing on their complementary differences, involving characteristic rationalities, typical forms of criticism, corresponding ways of exercising criticalities, and frames of reference regarding the sources of their criticalities. Based on such distinctions and contrasts, I will in the final section argue for their inherent value of coexistence, their practical value in illustrating the unique construction of academic educational studies which has respectively developed in the Anglo-American world and in the Continental world. As an additional point about their epistemic value to understand educational knowledge and scholarship accumulated in the West, I will further argue that these two philosophical–critical theories of education in parallel constitute peak academic experiences. This is mainly because they are compelling evidence, demonstrating how differently yet legitimately the two camps of Western educational scholarships deal with the same issue of criticality in contrasting yet complementary ways.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Philosophy,Education

Reference46 articles.

1. Benner, D. 1999. On the relationship between education and critique and the limitations of various sorts of Critical Pedagogies [教育学与批判──对各种批判教育科学思想的局限性及问题关系的思考]. (Trans by Q.L. Li and Z.M. Peng). Journal of East China Normal University (Education Sciences) [华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)] 2: 31–43.

2. Benner, D., and A. English. 2004. Critique and negativity: Towards the pluralisation of critique in educational practice, theory and research. Journal of Philosophy of Education 38: 409–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0309-8249.2004.00394.x.

3. Biesta, G. 2005. What can critical pedagogy learn from postmodernism? Further reflections on the impossible future of critical pedagogy. In Critical theory and critical pedagogy today: Toward a new critical language in education, ed. I. Gur-Zeʼev. Haifa: University of Haifa, Faculty of Education.

4. Biesta, G. 2011. Disciplines and theory in the academic study of education: A comparative analysis of the Anglo-American and Continental construction of the field. Pedagogy, Culture & Society 19(2): 175–192.

5. Burbules, N.C. 1992. Forms of ideology-critique: A pedagogical perspective. Qualitative Studies in Education 5(1): 7–17.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Unpacking expert teachers’ theory construction experiences: a case study;Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education;2024-07-22

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3