The opportunities and limits of Islamist ideological developments on the rights of non-Muslims and women

Author:

Wagemakers JoasORCID

Abstract

AbstractMost academic scholars of the Muslim Brotherhood and like-minded Islamist organisations seem to agree that these groups have come to accept the nation state and the rules of the democratic game over the past few decades. At the same time, several scholars have shown in their work that reforms and developments among Islamists with regard to the state and democracy have not been accompanied by similar trends on religious minority rights and especially women’s rights. The long-held Islamist ideal of an Islamic state in which Islam provides the identity of the state remains difficult to square with full and equal citizenship for non-Muslims. Similarly, Islamists have been willing to make concessions with regard to women’s rights by reinterpreting Islamic tradition, but this has not moved as far as their revisionism with regard to the state and democracy. What is holding them back? The objective of this special issue is to begin to answer this question through various case studies, all of which focus on gaining greater insight into (the development of) views on the rights of religious minorities and women among non-violent Islamists since the Islamic revival in the Middle East and North Africa in the 1960s.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Religious studies,Cultural Studies

Reference90 articles.

1. Abu Haniyya, H. (2008). Al-Mar’a wa-l-Siyasa min Manzur al-Harakat al-Islamiyya fi l-Urdunn. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.

2. Abu Rumman, M. (Ed.). (2018). Post-Islamism: A New Phase or Ideological Delusions? Friedrich Ebert Stiftung/Centre for Strategic Studies.

3. Abu-Munshar, M. Y. (2012). In the shadow of the ‘Arab Spring’: The fate of non-Muslims under Islamist rule. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations, 23(4), 487–503.

4. Al-Anani, K. (2018). The Muslim Brotherhood’s conception of citizenship rights in Egypt. Contemporary Arab Affairs, 11(3), 25–46.

5. Al-Azami, U. (2020). Why Words Matter: The Problem with the Term Islamist. Sadeq Institute Retrieved October 4, 2022, from https://www.sadeqinstitute.org/short-reads/why-words-matter-the-problem-with-the-term-islamist

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3