Abstract
Abstract
Background
Refugee women who leave their country due to persecution and violence have multiple barriers to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services. The COVID-19 pandemic added an additional barrier to in-person reproductive health education, dialogue, and clinical care. This study aimed to assess the potential of using virtual group meetings as a forum for refugee women to learn about and discuss reproductive health concerns such as cervical cancer screening, family planning, childbirth, and postpartum care.
Method
We conducted semi-structured interviews with 36 refugee women and stakeholders to assess factors that impact refugee women’s receptiveness for virtual platforms to obtain information and engage in discussions on reproductive health. Thematic analysis was conducted using the software Dedoose.
Results
Openness to engage in virtual platforms varied by refugee community, women’s demographic, and life experience. The women’s involvement with local refugee groups facilitated their engagement with virtual platforms. Furthermore, individuals’ family structure and marital relationship, along with literacy and English proficiency, and access to and familiarity with technology impacted engagement. Virtual groups needed to mirror confidentiality and women expressed a strong preference that groups were all-women.
Conclusion
Refugee women are receptive to virtual groups on SRH when they are offered in a culturally appropriate manner that considers the living situations and access to technology after arrival to the USA. Findings from this study provide a framework to develop and tailor effective virtual or hybrid virtual-in-person programs for women in refugee communities.
Funder
patient-centered outcomes research institute
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference32 articles.
1. Edwards A. UNHCR global trends - forced displacement in 2016. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. 2017. http://www.unhcr.org/globaltrends2016/. Accessed 9 Jan 2022.
2. Refugee Processing Center. Admissions and arrivals. U.S. Department of State. 2022. http://www.wrapsnet.org/admissions-and-arrivals/. (Accessed 9 Jan 2022).
3. PEW Research Center. Top states for U.S. Refugee resettlement in fiscal. 2019. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/10/07/key-facts-about-refugees-to-the-u-s/ft_19-10-07_refugees_top-states-us-refugee-resettlement-fiscal-2019/. Accessed 9 Jan 2022.
4. de Bocanegra HT, Carter-Pokras O, Ingleby JD, et al. Addressing refugee health through evidence-based policies: a case study. Ann Epidemiol. 2018;28(6):411–9.
5. Pottie K, Greenaway C, Feightner J, et al. Evidence-based clinical guidelines for immigrants and refugees. CMAJ. 2011;183(12):E824–925.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献