Refugee Women’s Receptiveness for Virtual Engagement on Reproductive Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author:

Thiel de Bocanegra HeikeORCID,Goliaei Zahra,Khan Nossin,Banna Sereen,Behnam Rawnaq,Mody Sheila K

Abstract

Abstract Background Refugee women who leave their country due to persecution and violence have multiple barriers to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services. The COVID-19 pandemic added an additional barrier to in-person reproductive health education, dialogue, and clinical care. This study aimed to assess the potential of using virtual group meetings as a forum for refugee women to learn about and discuss reproductive health concerns such as cervical cancer screening, family planning, childbirth, and postpartum care. Method We conducted semi-structured interviews with 36 refugee women and stakeholders to assess factors that impact refugee women’s receptiveness for virtual platforms to obtain information and engage in discussions on reproductive health. Thematic analysis was conducted using the software Dedoose. Results Openness to engage in virtual platforms varied by refugee community, women’s demographic, and life experience. The women’s involvement with local refugee groups facilitated their engagement with virtual platforms. Furthermore, individuals’ family structure and marital relationship, along with literacy and English proficiency, and access to and familiarity with technology impacted engagement. Virtual groups needed to mirror confidentiality and women expressed a strong preference that groups were all-women. Conclusion Refugee women are receptive to virtual groups on SRH when they are offered in a culturally appropriate manner that considers the living situations and access to technology after arrival to the USA. Findings from this study provide a framework to develop and tailor effective virtual or hybrid virtual-in-person programs for women in refugee communities.

Funder

patient-centered outcomes research institute

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Applied Psychology

Reference32 articles.

1. Edwards A. UNHCR global trends - forced displacement in 2016. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. 2017. http://www.unhcr.org/globaltrends2016/. Accessed 9 Jan 2022.

2. Refugee Processing Center. Admissions and arrivals. U.S. Department of State. 2022. http://www.wrapsnet.org/admissions-and-arrivals/. (Accessed 9 Jan 2022).

3. PEW Research Center. Top states for U.S. Refugee resettlement in fiscal. 2019. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/10/07/key-facts-about-refugees-to-the-u-s/ft_19-10-07_refugees_top-states-us-refugee-resettlement-fiscal-2019/. Accessed 9 Jan 2022.

4. de Bocanegra HT, Carter-Pokras O, Ingleby JD, et al. Addressing refugee health through evidence-based policies: a case study. Ann Epidemiol. 2018;28(6):411–9.

5. Pottie K, Greenaway C, Feightner J, et al. Evidence-based clinical guidelines for immigrants and refugees. CMAJ. 2011;183(12):E824–925.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3