Author:
Black Carolyn M.,Morse Stephen A.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference104 articles.
1. Davis JD, Riley PK, Peters CW, Rand KH: A comparison of ligase chain reaction to polymerase chain reaction in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis endocervical infections. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 1998, 6:57–60.
2. Pasternack R, Vuorinen P, Pitkajarvi T, et al.: Comparison of manual Amplicor PCR, Cobas Amplicor PCR, and LCx assays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women by using urine specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1997, 35:402–405.
3. Puolakkainen M, Hiltunen-Back E, Reunala T, et al.: Comparison of performances of two commercially available tests, a PCR assay and ligase chain reaction test, in detection of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. J Clin Microbiol 1998, 36:1489–1493.
4. Goessens WH, Mouton JW, van der Meijden WI, et al.: Comparison of three commercially available amplification assays, AMP CT, LCx, and COBAS AMPLICOR, for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine. J Clin Microbiol 1997, 35:2628–2633.
5. Steingrimsson O, Jonsdottir K, Olafsson JH, et al.: Comparison of Roche Cobas Amplicor and Abbott LCx for the rapid detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in specimens from highrisk patients. Sex Transm Dis 1998, 25:44–48.
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献