On the effects that motivate pesticide use in perspective of designing a cropping system without pesticides but with mineral fertilizer—a review

Author:

Pergner IsabellORCID,Lippert Christian

Abstract

AbstractIn the future, a cropping system that guarantees food security by delivering high yields and, simultaneously, protects our environment is desperately needed. This can be achieved through a cropping system that waives chemical synthetic plant protection products, which endanger, for example, biodiversity and water resources. However, such a system, referred to here as the mineral-ecological cropping system (MECS), should still allow for the usage of mineral fertilizers to ensure high yields. It can be thought of as a compromise between the current conventional and organic cropping systems. This article presents a comprehensive literature review on the economic, social, and environmental effects of pesticides and the resulting reasons farmers have to use (or not use) them. Hereby, regarding future pesticide reduction, we identify hindrances and potential benefits that could be mobilized to design the MECS. The major points are the following: in a MECS, (1) it is expected that yields and temporal stability of yields will be higher than in organic farming, but lower than in conventional farming; (2) profitability might suffer due to high input costs and energy consumption; (3) it is expected that soil fertility and biodiversity protection will increase along with the promotion of alternative disease and pest control measures; (4) crop rotations will be wider and more diverse than in conventional farming; (5) mineral fertilizer cannot be optimally used by the crops unless a balanced supply of nitrogen is achieved. Farmers who want to switch to MECS should be compensated as they are likely to experience higher costs and lower yield and yield stability. The lessons learned from this review will help to progress toward an innovative and sustainable cropping system. Further research should focus on rational farmers’ adaptation possibilities when abandoning pesticides while still using mineral fertilizers.

Funder

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

Universität Hohenheim

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Agronomy and Crop Science,Environmental Engineering

Reference91 articles.

1. Abhilash PC, Singh N (2009) Pesticide use and application: an Indian scenario. J Hazard Mater 165:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.10.061

2. Antle JM, Pingali PL (1994) Pesticides, productivity, and farmer health: a Philippine case study. Amer J Agr Econ 76:418–430

3. BMU (Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit) and Bundesamt für Naturschutz (2020) Die Lage der Natur in Deutschland: Ergebnisse von EU-Vogelschutz- und FFH-Bericht, Berlin, Bonn. www.bmu.de. Accessed 3 Nov 2020

4. Boussemart J-P, Leleu H, Ojo O (2011) Could society’s willingness to reduce pesticide use be aligned with farmers’ economic self-interest? Ecol Econ 70:1797–1804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.05.005

5. Bright JA, Morris AJ, Winspear R (2008) A review of indirect effects of pesticides on birds and mitigating land-management practices, Bedfordshire. https://ww2.rspb.org.uk/Images/bright_morris_winspear_tcm9-192457.pdf. Accessed 7 December 2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3