Abstract
AbstractIn the future, a cropping system that guarantees food security by delivering high yields and, simultaneously, protects our environment is desperately needed. This can be achieved through a cropping system that waives chemical synthetic plant protection products, which endanger, for example, biodiversity and water resources. However, such a system, referred to here as the mineral-ecological cropping system (MECS), should still allow for the usage of mineral fertilizers to ensure high yields. It can be thought of as a compromise between the current conventional and organic cropping systems. This article presents a comprehensive literature review on the economic, social, and environmental effects of pesticides and the resulting reasons farmers have to use (or not use) them. Hereby, regarding future pesticide reduction, we identify hindrances and potential benefits that could be mobilized to design the MECS. The major points are the following: in a MECS, (1) it is expected that yields and temporal stability of yields will be higher than in organic farming, but lower than in conventional farming; (2) profitability might suffer due to high input costs and energy consumption; (3) it is expected that soil fertility and biodiversity protection will increase along with the promotion of alternative disease and pest control measures; (4) crop rotations will be wider and more diverse than in conventional farming; (5) mineral fertilizer cannot be optimally used by the crops unless a balanced supply of nitrogen is achieved. Farmers who want to switch to MECS should be compensated as they are likely to experience higher costs and lower yield and yield stability. The lessons learned from this review will help to progress toward an innovative and sustainable cropping system. Further research should focus on rational farmers’ adaptation possibilities when abandoning pesticides while still using mineral fertilizers.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Universität Hohenheim
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science,Environmental Engineering
Reference91 articles.
1. Abhilash PC, Singh N (2009) Pesticide use and application: an Indian scenario. J Hazard Mater 165:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.10.061
2. Antle JM, Pingali PL (1994) Pesticides, productivity, and farmer health: a Philippine case study. Amer J Agr Econ 76:418–430
3. BMU (Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit) and Bundesamt für Naturschutz (2020) Die Lage der Natur in Deutschland: Ergebnisse von EU-Vogelschutz- und FFH-Bericht, Berlin, Bonn. www.bmu.de. Accessed 3 Nov 2020
4. Boussemart J-P, Leleu H, Ojo O (2011) Could society’s willingness to reduce pesticide use be aligned with farmers’ economic self-interest? Ecol Econ 70:1797–1804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.05.005
5. Bright JA, Morris AJ, Winspear R (2008) A review of indirect effects of pesticides on birds and mitigating land-management practices, Bedfordshire. https://ww2.rspb.org.uk/Images/bright_morris_winspear_tcm9-192457.pdf. Accessed 7 December 2022
Cited by
24 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献