Abstract
AbstractValidation of models for plant disease management is a crucial part in the development of decision support systems in plant protection. Bespoke field trials are usually conducted to determine the performance of a model under practical conditions. However, field trials are very resource-demanding, and the use of already existing field trial data could significantly reduce costs for model validation. In this study, we took this novel approach to verify the performance of models for determining the need of fungicide applications against leaf blotch diseases in wheat by utilising historical weather data and yield data available from fungicide efficacy field trials. Two models based on humidity factors were used in the study. To estimate how specific humidity settings in the two models affect the number of recommended fungicide treatments per season, historical weather data from a 5-year period from weather stations in Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Lithuania was used. The model output shows major differences between seasons and regions, typically recommending between one and three treatments per season. To determine the prediction potential of the models, data on yield gains from either one or two fungicide applications in fungicide efficacy trials conducted in wheat over a 5-year period in the five countries was utilised. The yield responses from fungicide treatments in the efficacy trials varied considerably between years and countries, as did the proportion of predictions of profitable treatments. In general, there was a tendency for the models to overestimate the need to apply fungicides (low specificity), but they rarely failed to recommend an application that was needed (high sensitivity). Despite the importance of having specific trials across regions in order to adjust models to local cropping and weather conditions, our study shows that historical weather data and existing field trial data have the potential to be used in model validation.
Funder
Finnish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry
Danish AgriFish Agency
Lithuanian Research Center for Agriculture and Forestry
Norwegian Research Council
Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science,Environmental Engineering
Reference39 articles.
1. Bligaard J, Jørgensen LN, Axelsen J, Hansen JG, Ørum JE, Baby S, Nielsen GC (2017) Udvikling af nye risikomodeller for Septoria (Zymoseptoria tritici) i vinterhvede. Miljø- og Fødevareministeriet, Miljøstyrelsen. Bekæmpelsesmiddelforskning nr. 168. ISBN: 978-87-93529-68-7
2. Bhathal JS, Loughman R, Speijers J (2003) Yield reduction in wheat in relation to leaf disease from yellow (tan) spot and septoria nodorum blotch. Eur J Plant Pathol 109:435–443
3. Burke JJ, Dunne B (2008) Field testing of six decision support systems for scheduling fungicide applications to control Mycosphaerella graminicola on winter wheat crops in Ireland. J Agric Sci 146:415–428. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859607007642
4. Cook RJ, Thomas MR (1990) Influence of site factors in responses of winter wheat to fungicide programmes in England and Wales, 1979-1987. Plant Pathol 39:548–557
5. Coakley SM, McDaniel LR, Shaner G (1985) Model for predicting severity of septoria tritici blotch on winter wheat. Phytopathology 75:1245–1251
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献