Abstract
AbstractIn the recent past, pulse crops have become increasingly important to agricultural producers as they contribute significantly to the economy. However, the research surrounding the economics of pulse crops is limited. This study determined the net returns and risks of 14 different rotations with various frequencies and sequences of pulse crops and quantified the long-term economic effects. An 8-year field experiment (two 4-year rotation cycles) was carried out at Swift Current, Saskatchewan, and Brooks, Alberta, Canada, during 2010–2019. The crops in the rotation included spring and durum wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) (W), field pea (Pisum sativum L.) (P), chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) (C), lentil (Lens culinaris Medik) (L), and Oriental mustard (Brassica juncea L.) (M). Net revenue was estimated and a simulation model was used to conduct the risk-return analysis. Net revenue was significantly different among the 14 rotations, where rotations with either high frequencies of lentil or diverse crops generated the highest net income. More diverse rotations such as P-M-L-W or L-C-P-W provided net income that were statistically comparable to the L-L-L-W rotation and were significantly greater than wheat monoculture systems. Risk analysis suggested that neutral or slightly risk averse producers may select rotations with higher frequencies of lentils, whereas more risk averse producers may prefer more diverse rotations. Inclusion of pulses in a rotation as preceding crops had a positive economic impact on the following non-pulse crops and reduced nitrogen cost by 37%, which can lead to a low carbon footprint. Long-term studies with comprehensive datasets are rare and here for the first time we had two full 4-year cycles of experimental data for 14 diverse rotations at three sites, enabling us to make sound conclusions—adopting diverse cropping rotations that include pulses, especially lentil, can reduce economic risks and improve farm profitability.
Funder
Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science,Environmental Engineering
Reference52 articles.
1. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. (2021) Canada: Outlook for Principal Field Crops, 2021-05-20. Government of Canada. https://agriculture.canada.ca/en/canadas-agriculture-sectors/crops/reports-and-statistics-data-canadian-principal-field-crops/canada-outlook-principal-field-crops-2021-05-20. Accessed 21 December 2021
2. Bainard LD, Navarro-Borrell A, Hamel C, Braun K, Hanson K, Gan Y (2017) Increasing the frequency of pulses in crop rotations reduces soil fungal diversity and increases the proportion of fungal pathotrophs in a semiarid agroecosystem. Agric Ecosyst Environ 240:206–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.02.020
3. Banniza S, Armstrong-Cho CL, Gan Y, Chongo G (2011) Evaluation of fungicide efficacy and application frequency for the control of Ascochyta blight in chickpea. Can J Plant Pathol 33:135–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060661.2011.561875
4. Bezdicek DF, Granatstein D (1989) Crop rotation efficiencies and biological diversity in farming systems. Am J Altern Agric 4:111–119. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0889189300002927
5. Burgess MH, Miller PR, Jones CA (2012) Pulse crops improve energy intensity and productivity of cereal production in Montana, USA. J Surv Eng-Asce 36:669–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/10440046.2012.672380
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献