Abstract
AbstractIn this paper, the performance of different continuous-time and discrete-time models of the electrical subsystem of induction machines and permanent-magnet synchronous machines as well as methods based on them for decoupling the direct and quadrature axis components of the stator current are investigated and compared. The focus here is on inverter-fed, pulse width modulated drives when operated with a relatively large product of stator frequency and sampling time, where significant differences between the models and decoupling methods used come to light. Recommendations for a discrete-time model to be used uniformly in the future are made, as well as statements on whether feedforward or feedback decoupling structures are better suited and whether state controllers improve decoupling measures for very steep speed ramps. Simulation studies and measurement results support the statements made above.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Reference11 articles.
1. Hinkkanen M, Awan HAA, Qu Z, Tuovinen T, Briz F (2015) Current control for synchronous motor drives: direct discrete-time pole-placement design. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 52(2):1530–1541
2. Nuß U (1994) Eine allgemeine Methodik zur Modellbildung und Reglersynthese für stromrichtergespeiste Antriebe auf der Basis der zeitdiskreten Zustandsraumdarstellung. Postdoctoral thesis, University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany (in German)
3. Kim H, Degner MW, Guerrero JM, Briz F, Lorenz RD (2010) Discrete-time current regulator design for AC machine drives. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 46(4):1425–1435. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2010.2049628
4. Nuß U (2010) Hochdynamische Regelung elektrischer Antriebe, 1st edn. VDE, Berlin, Offenbach (in German)
5. Hoffmann N, Fuchs FW, Kazmierkowski MP, Schroder D (2016) Digital current control in a rotating reference frame - part I: system modeling and the discrete time-domain current controller with improved decoupling capabilities. IEEE Trans Power Electron 31(7):5290–5305. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2015.2481726