Abstract
AbstractIncreasing average temperatures and heat waves are having devasting impacts on human health and well-being but studies of heat impacts and how people adapt are rare and often confined to specific locations. In this study, we explore how analysis of conversations on social media can be used to understand how people feel about heat waves and how they respond. We collected global Twitter data over four months (from January to April 2022) using predefined hashtags about heat waves. Topic modelling identified five topics. The largest (one-third of all tweets) was related to sports events. The remaining two-thirds could be allocated to four topics connected to communication about climate-related heat or heat waves. Two of these were on the impacts of heat and heat waves (health impacts 20%; social impacts 16%), one was on extreme weather and climate change attribution (17%) and the last one was on perceptions and warning (13%). The number of tweets in each week corresponded well with major heat wave occurrences in Argentina, Australia, the USA and South Asia (India and Pakistan), indicating that people posting tweets were aware of the threat from heat and its impacts on the society. Among the words frequently used within the topic ‘Social impacts’ were ‘air-conditioning’ and ‘electricity’, suggesting links between coping strategies and financial pressure. Apart from analysing the content of tweets, new insights were also obtained from analysing how people engaged with Twitter tweets about heat or heat waves. We found that tweets posted early, and which were then shared by other influential Twitter users, were among the most popular. Finally, we found that the most popular tweets belonged to individual scientists or respected news outlets, with no evidence that misinformation about climate change-related heat is widespread.
Funder
Charles Darwin University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous),Atmospheric Science,Water Science and Technology
Reference86 articles.
1. Abdullah NA, Nishioka D, Tanaka Y, Murayama Y (2015) User’s action and decision making of retweet messages towards reducing misinformation spread during disaster. J Inf Process 23:31–40
2. Abedin B, Babar A (2018) Institutional vs. non-institutional use of social media during emergency response: a case of Twitter in 2014 Australian bush fire. Inf Syst Front 20:729–740
3. Agarwal N, Sikka G, Awasthi LK (2020) Evaluation of web service clustering using dirichlet Multinomial Mixture model based approach for dimensionality reduction in service representation. Inf Process Manag 57:102238
4. Allcott H, Gentzkow M (2017) Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. J Econ Perspect 31:211–235
5. Andrews O, Le Quere C, Kjellstrom T, Lemke B, Haines A (2018) Populations exposed to extreme heat under climate change: implications for workability and survivability. Lancet Planet Health 2:e540–e547
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献