Chance Discovery Using Dialectical Argumentation-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Chance Discovery Using Dialectical Argumentation

Published:2001 Issue: Volume: Page:414-424
ISSN:0302-9743
Container-title:New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

McBurney Peter,Parsons Simon

Publisher

Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/3-540-45548-5_57

Reference12 articles.

1. L. Amgoud, N. Maudet, and S. Parsons. Modelling dialogues using argumentation. In E. Durfee, editor, Proc. Fourth Intern. Conf. on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 2000), pages 31–38, Boston, MA, USA, 2000. IEEE.

2. D. V. Carbogim, D. S. Robertson, and J. R. Lee. Argument-based applications to knowledge engineering. Knowledge Engineering Review, 15(2):119–149, 2000.

3. C. L. Hamblin. Fallacies. Methuen and Co Ltd, London, UK, 1970.

4. K. Harper. Hatfield: the warnings Railtrack ignored. The Guardian, 16 January 2001. (U.K.).

5. D. Hitchcock. Some principles of rational mutual inquiry. In F. van Eemeren et al., editor, Proc. Second Intern. Conf. on Argumentation, pages 236–243, Amsterdam, 1991. SICSAT.

Cited by 28 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Explanation–Question–Response dialogue: An argumentative tool for explainable AI;Argument & Computation;2024-03-21

2. Dialogue and Persuasion;The Burden of Proof upon Metaphysical Methods;2023

3. Explainable Argumentation for Wellness Consultation;Lecture Notes in Computer Science;2019

4. An Argumentation-Based Perspective Over the Social IoT;IEEE Internet of Things Journal;2018-08

5. Towards mining scientific discourse using argumentation schemes;Argument & Computation;2018-07-16