Meta-analysis of natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopy for colorectal cancer-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

登录注册会员服务联系我们

Meta-analysis of natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopy for colorectal cancer

Published:2020-09-02 Issue:2 Volume:406 Page:283-299
ISSN:1435-2443
Container-title:Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
language:en
Short-container-title:Langenbecks Arch Surg

Author:

Lin Jiajing,Lin Suyong,Chen Zhihua,Zheng Bingqiu,Lin Yilin,Zheng Yan,Liu Yisu,Chen Shao Qin

Funder

Distinguished Young Scientific Research Talents Plan in Universities of Fujian Province

Department of Education, Fujian Province

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Surgery

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00423-020-01934-8.pdf

Reference43 articles.

1. van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Fürst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ, Group CcLoORIS (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14(3):210–218

2. Kim W, Kim H-H, Han S-U, Kim M-C, Hyung WJ, Ryu SW, Cho GS, Kim CY, Yang H-K, Park DJ (2016) Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer. Ann Surg 263(1):28–35

3. Sakuramoto S, Yamashita K, Kikuchi S, Futawatari N, Katada N, Watanabe M, Okutomi T, Wang G, Bax L (2013) Laparoscopy versus open distal gastrectomy by expert surgeons for early gastric cancer in Japanese patients: short-term clinical outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 27(5):1695–1705

4. Romy S, Eisenring M-C, Bettschart V, Petignat C, Francioli P, Troillet N (2008) Laparoscope use and surgical site infections in digestive surgery. Ann Surg 247(4):627–632

5. Singh R, Omiccioli A, Hegge S, McKinley C (2008) Does the extraction-site location in laparoscopic colorectal surgery have an impact on incisional hernia rates? Surg Endosc 22(12):2596–2600

Cited by 25 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Meta-analysis of robotic-assisted NOSE versus traditional TWSR in colorectal cancer surgery: postoperative outcomes and efficacy;BMC Surgery;2024-08-22

2. Transvaginal versus transabdominal specimen extraction in minimally invasive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery;2024-06-03

3. Simultaneous laparoscopic colectomy and liver metastasectomy with natural orifice specimen extraction: A proof-of-concept study;Heliyon;2024-06

4. Intracorporeal antimesenteric ancillary trocar: an anastomotic technique facilitating natural orifice specimen extraction in left‐sided colorectal surgery;Colorectal Disease;2024-02

5. Comparative long-term outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic colectomy for left-sided colorectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis;International Journal of Surgery;2024-01-17

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线，采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统，可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容，当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种，收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇，并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询！咨询电话：010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号京ICP备18003416号-3