Author:
Nassar Ahmad H. M.,Ng Hwei Jene
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
The main sources of post-cholecystectomy bile leakage (PCBL) not involving major duct injuries are the cystic duct and subvesical/hepatocystic ducts. Of the many studies on the diagnosis and management of PCBL, few addressed measures to avoid this serious complication. The aim of this study was to examine the causes and mechanisms leading to PCBL and to evaluate the effects of specific preventative strategies.
Methods
A prospectively maintained database of 5675 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomies was analysed. Risk factors for post-cholecystectomy bile leakage were identified and documented and technical modifications and strategies were adopted to prevent this complication. The incidence, causes and management of patients who suffered bile leaks were studied and their preoperative characteristics, operative data and postoperative outcomes were compared with patients where potential risks were identified and PCBL avoided and with the rest of the series.
Results
Twenty-five patients (0.4%) had PCBL (7 expected and less than half requiring reintervention): 11 from cystic ducts (0.2%), 3 from subvesical ducts (0.05%) and 11 from unconfirmed sources (0.2%). The incidence of cystic duct leakage was significantly lower with ties (0.15%) than with clips (0.7%). Fifty-two percent had difficulty grades IV or V, 36% had empyema or acute cholecystitis and 16% had contracted gallbladders. Twelve patients required 17 reinterventions before PCBL resolved; 7 percutaneous drainage, 6 ERCP and 4 relaparoscopy. The median hospital stay was 17 days with no mortality. Hepatocystic ducts were encountered in 72 patients (1.3%) and were secured with loops (54.2%), ties (25%) or sutures (20.8%) with no PCBL. Eighteen sectoral ducts were identified and secured.
Conclusion
Ligation of the cystic duct reduces the incidence of PCBL resulting from dislodged endoclips. Careful blunt dissection in the proper anatomical planes avoiding direct or thermal injury to subvesical and sectoral ducts and a policy of actively searching for hepatocystic ducts during gallbladder separation to identify and secure them can reduce bile leakage from such ducts.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. Vecchio R, MacFadyen B, Latteri S (1998) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an analysis of 114,005 cases of United States series. Int Surg 83(3):215–219
2. Merrie A, Booth M, Shah A, Pettigrew R, McCall J (1997) Bile duct imaging and injury. A regional audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Aust N Z J Surg 67:706–711
3. McMahon A, Fullarton G, Baxter J, O’Dwyer P (1995) Bile duct injury and bile leakage in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 82(3):307–313
4. Lee W, Chan C, Wang B (2013) Recent advances in laparoscopic surgery. Asian J Endosc Surg 6(1):1–8
5. Kozarek R, Gannon R, Baerg R, Wagonfeld J, Ball T (1992) Bile leak after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Diagnosis and therapeutic application of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Arch Intern Med 152(5):1040–3
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献