Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
The management of patients with suspected appendicitis remains a challenge in daily clinical practice, and the optimal management algorithm is still being debated. Negative appendectomy rates (NAR) continue to range between 10 and 15%. This prospective study evaluated the accuracy of a diagnostic pathway in acute appendicitis using clinical risk stratification (Alvarado score), routine ultrasonography, gynecology consult for females, and selected CT after clinical reassessment.
Methods
Patients presenting with suspected appendicitis between November 2015 and September 2017 from age 18 years and above were included. Decision-making followed a clear management pathway. Patients were followed up for 6 months after discharge. The hypothesis was that the algorithm can reduce the NAR to a value of under 10%.
Results
A total of 183 patients were included. In 65 of 69 appendectomies, acute appendicitis was confirmed by histopathology, corresponding to a NAR of 5.8%. Notably, all 4 NAR appendectomies had other pathologies of the appendix. The perforation rate was 24.6%. Only 36 patients (19.7%) received a CT scan. The follow-up rate after 30 days achieved 69%, including no patients with missed appendicitis. The sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic pathway was 100% and 96.6%, respectively. The potential saving in costs can be as much as 19.8 million €/100,000 cases presenting with the suspicion of appendicitis.
Conclusion
The risk-stratified diagnostic algorithm yields a high diagnostic accuracy for patients with suspicion of appendicitis. Its implementation can safely reduce the NAR, simultaneously minimizing the use of CT scans and optimizing healthcare-related costs in the treatment of acute appendicitis.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02627781 (December 2015)
Funder
Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference39 articles.
1. Ferris M, Quan S, Kaplan BS, Molodecky N, Ball CG, Chernoff GW, Bhala N, Ghosh S, Dixon E, Ng S, Kaplan GG (2017) The global incidence of appendicitis: a systematic review of population-based studies. Ann Surg 266(2):237–241. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002188
2. Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes (2017) Die 50 häufigsten Operationen der vollstationären Patientinnen und Patienten in Krankenhäusern [Online]. http://www.gbe-bund.de (Startseite > Gesundheitsversorgung > Medizinische Verfahren, Medizinische Untersuchungen und Behandlungen > Operationen und Prozeduren in Krankenhäusern). Accessed 19 June 2020
3. Engin O, Calik B, Yildirim M, Coskun A, Coskun GA (2011) Gynecologic pathologies in our appendectomy series and literature review. J Korean Surg Soc 80(4):267–271. https://doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2011.80.4.267
4. Flum DR, McClure TD, Morris A, Koepsell T (2005) Misdiagnosis of appendicitis and the use of diagnostic imaging. J Am Coll Surg 201(6):933–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.04.039
5. Wagner PL, Eachempati SR, Soe K, Pieracci FM, Shou J, Barie PS (2008) Defining the current negative appendectomy rate: for whom is preoperative computed tomography making an impact? Surgery 144(2):276–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2008.03.040
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献