Single versus double Hem-o-lok clips to secure the apendiceal stump during laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized multicentric clinical trial

Author:

Aday UlaşORCID,Çetin ErmanORCID,Kafadar Mehmet TolgaORCID,Oğuz AbdullahORCID,Bahadır Mehmet VeysiORCID,Ülger Burak VeliORCID,Gedik ErcanORCID,Girgin SadullahORCID,Yılmaz MehmetORCID

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Polymeric clips (Hem-o-lok ligation system) are now widely used to securing the base of the appendix during laparoscopic appendectomy. Studies comparing the use of single or double hem-o-lok clips are limited. The aim of this study was to compare the reliability of a single hem-o-lok clips with a double hem-o-lok clips for closure of an appendiceal stump. Methods This prospective randomized study includes patients from two centers who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy with the diagnosis of appendicitis between September 2020 and March 2023. Demographic, operative and clinical outcomes of the use of single or double hem-o-lok clips for closure of the appendiceal stump were compared. Factors affecting long postoperative hospital stay were investigated using univariate and multivariate analyzes. Results One hundred forty two (48.3%) patients in the single hem-o-lok arm and 152 (51.7%) patients in the double hem-o-lok arm were included in the analysis.The shortest operative time was noted in the single hem-o-lok group (52.1 ± 19.9 versus 61.6 ± 24.9 min, p < 0.001). The median hospital stay was 1 day (range 1–10) in the single hem-o-lok group and 1 day (range 1–12) in the double hem-o-lok group, and was shorter in the single hem-o-lok arm (1.61 ± 1.56 vs 1.84 ± 1.69, p = 0.019). Based on multivariate analysis, drain placement was identified as an independent predictive factor for long hospital stay. Conclusions The use of single hem-o-lok clips for appendiceal stump closure during laparoscopic appendectomy is safe and effective. Trial registration NCT04387370 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Funder

Dicle University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference24 articles.

1. Dai L, Shuai J (2017) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults and children: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. United Eur Gastroenterol J 4:542–553

2. Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Arimoto Y, Nishiguchi Y, Maeda K, Hirakawa K (2012) Meta-analysis of the results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopic and open surgery for acute appendicitis. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1929–1939

3. Matyja M, Strzałka M, Rembiasz K (2015) Laparoscopic appendectomy, costefectiveness of three diferent techniques used to close the appendix stump. Pol Przegl Chir 7(12):634–637

4. Mannu GS, Sudul MK, Bettencourt-Silva JH, Cumber E, Li F, Clark AB et al (2017) Closure methods of the apendix stump for complications during laparoscopic appendectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:CD006437

5. Costa-Navarro D, Jimenes-Fuertes M, Illian-Riquelme A (2013) Laparoscopic appendectomy: quality care and cost efectiveness for today’s economy. World J Emerg Surg 8:45

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3