Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Polymeric clips (Hem-o-lok ligation system) are now widely used to securing the base of the appendix during laparoscopic appendectomy. Studies comparing the use of single or double hem-o-lok clips are limited. The aim of this study was to compare the reliability of a single hem-o-lok clips with a double hem-o-lok clips for closure of an appendiceal stump.
Methods
This prospective randomized study includes patients from two centers who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy with the diagnosis of appendicitis between September 2020 and March 2023. Demographic, operative and clinical outcomes of the use of single or double hem-o-lok clips for closure of the appendiceal stump were compared. Factors affecting long postoperative hospital stay were investigated using univariate and multivariate analyzes.
Results
One hundred forty two (48.3%) patients in the single hem-o-lok arm and 152 (51.7%) patients in the double hem-o-lok arm were included in the analysis.The shortest operative time was noted in the single hem-o-lok group (52.1 ± 19.9 versus 61.6 ± 24.9 min, p < 0.001). The median hospital stay was 1 day (range 1–10) in the single hem-o-lok group and 1 day (range 1–12) in the double hem-o-lok group, and was shorter in the single hem-o-lok arm (1.61 ± 1.56 vs 1.84 ± 1.69, p = 0.019). Based on multivariate analysis, drain placement was identified as an independent predictive factor for long hospital stay.
Conclusions
The use of single hem-o-lok clips for appendiceal stump closure during laparoscopic appendectomy is safe and effective.
Trial registration NCT04387370 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. Dai L, Shuai J (2017) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults and children: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. United Eur Gastroenterol J 4:542–553
2. Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Arimoto Y, Nishiguchi Y, Maeda K, Hirakawa K (2012) Meta-analysis of the results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopic and open surgery for acute appendicitis. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1929–1939
3. Matyja M, Strzałka M, Rembiasz K (2015) Laparoscopic appendectomy, costefectiveness of three diferent techniques used to close the appendix stump. Pol Przegl Chir 7(12):634–637
4. Mannu GS, Sudul MK, Bettencourt-Silva JH, Cumber E, Li F, Clark AB et al (2017) Closure methods of the apendix stump for complications during laparoscopic appendectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:CD006437
5. Costa-Navarro D, Jimenes-Fuertes M, Illian-Riquelme A (2013) Laparoscopic appendectomy: quality care and cost efectiveness for today’s economy. World J Emerg Surg 8:45