Abstract
Abstract
Objective
This study aimed to assess the feasibility and effects of a simple-to-implement multicomponent intervention to reduce sedentary time of office workers.
Methods
Six groups of eight to ten office workers took part in the two-week Leicht Bewegt intervention. Participants completed questionnaires at baseline (T0, n = 52), after 2 weeks (T1, n = 46), and after 5 weeks (T2, n = 38), including subjective sedentary measures and social-cognitive variables based on the health action process approach (HAPA). Objective sedentary measures were obtained using activPAL trackers.
Results
The intention to reduce sedentary behavior during work increased significantly from T0 to T1. Participants’ objective and subjective sitting time decreased significantly from T0 to T1, corresponding to an average decrease per 8-h-workday of 55 min (d = − .66) or 74 min (d = − 1.14), respectively. This reduction persisted (for subjective sitting time) at T2 (d = − 1.08). Participants indicated a high satisfaction with the intervention.
Conclusions
The Leicht Bewegt intervention offers a feasible and effective opportunity to reduce sedentary behavior at work. Randomized controlled trials including longer follow-up time periods are needed to validate its benefits in different workplaces.
Funder
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference56 articles.
1. Adams M, Davis P, Gill D (2013) A hybrid online intervention for reducing sedentary behavior in obese women. Front Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2013.00045
2. Aminian S, Hinckson EA (2012) Examining the validity of the ActivPAL monitor in measuring posture and ambulatory movement in children. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 9(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-119
3. Atkin AJ, Gorely T, Clemes SA, Yates T, Edwardson C, Brage S, Salmon J, Marshall SJ, Biddle SJ (2012) Methods of measurement in epidemiology: sedentary behaviour. Int J Epidemiol 41(5):1460–1471. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys118
4. Backé EM, Kreis L, Latza U (2018) Interventionen am Arbeitsplatz, die zur Veränderung des Sitzverhaltens anregen. Zentralblatt Für Arbeitsmedizin, Arbeitsschutz Und Ergonomie 69(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40664-018-0284-7
5. Bechmann S, Jäckle R, Lück P, Herdegen R (2011) iga-Report 20 - Motive und Hemmnisse für Betriebliches Gesundheitsmanagement (BGM). Initiative Gesundheit und Arbeit. https://www.iga-info.de/veroeffentlichungen/igareporte/igareport-20/