Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
The physical activity paradox states occupational physical activity (OPA) to be hazardous and leisure time physical activity (LTPA) to be beneficial for health. Yet, the acute effects of OPA and LTPA on cardiovascular risk factors are sparsely investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate the acute effects on ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) from steps/hour during work and leisure time among cleaners.
Methods
Data were obtained from a cluster randomized worksite intervention among 91 cleaners in Denmark and included a questionnaire, objective physical measurements, ABP (measured across 24 h), and steps/hour (measured during work and leisure time). A preliminary linear regression analysis was conducted as a mixed model including random intercept and slope, allowing for both within- and between-participant variability. We adjusted for sex, age, job seniority, medication use, smoking, self-reported fitness and BMI. Changes in ABP (mmHg) were estimated per 100 steps/hour.
Results
The number of steps taken was not associated with ABP during either work or leisure. Moreover, the ABP did not seem to differ between exposure to steps taken during work (systolic − 0.42 mmHg, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): − 1.10–0.25, diastolic − 0.03 mmHg, 95% CI, − 0.45–0.39) and leisure time (systolic -0.47 mmHg, 95% CI, − 1.66–0.72, diastolic 0.25 mmHg, 95% CI, − 0.46–0.97).
Conclusion
Our findings show no significant association between steps/hour and ABP and no contrasting effects between work and leisure time. These mechanisms fostering the divergent results need to be further investigated to improve the understanding of the physical activity paradox.
Funder
The Working Environment Research Fund
Zealand Region
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference49 articles.
1. Aadahl M, Zacho M, Linneberg A, Thuesen BH, Jørgensen T (2013) Comparison of the Danish step test and the watt-max test for estimation of maximal oxygen uptake: the Health 2008 study. Eur J Prev Cardiol 20(6):1088–1094. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487312462825
2. Allen MS, Vella SA (2015) Longitudinal determinants of walking, moderate, and vigorous physical activity in Australian adults. Prev Med 78:101–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.07.014
3. Allesøe K, Søgaard K, Aadahl M, Boyle E, Holtermann A (2016) Are hypertensive women at additional risk of ischaemic heart disease from physically demanding work? Eur J Prev Cardiol 23(10):1054–1061. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487316631681
4. Åstrand P-O, Rodahl K, Dahl HA, Stromme SB. (Red.). (2003). Textbook of Work Physiology: Physiological Bases of Exercise (4. ed). Human Kinetics.
5. Baumgart P, Kamp J (1998) Accuracy of the SpaceLabs Medical 90217 ambulatory blood pressure monitor. Blood Press Monit 3(5):303–307