Worldview Under Stress: Preliminary Findings on Cardiovascular and Cortisol Stress Responses Predicted by Secularity, Religiosity, Spirituality, and Existential Search
-
Published:2020-03-27
Issue:6
Volume:59
Page:2969-2989
-
ISSN:0022-4197
-
Container-title:Journal of Religion and Health
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Relig Health
Author:
Schnell Tatjana,Fuchs Dietmar,Hefti René
Abstract
AbstractThis study reports preliminary findings on the hypothesis that worldview can predict cardiovascular and cortisol responses to social stress. Based on theory and previous findings, we assumed that worldview security would provide a basis for stress resilience. Accordingly, religious and atheist individuals were expected to show higher stress resilience than spiritual and agnostic participants. Likewise, dimensional measures of religiosity and atheism were hypothesized to predict decreased, and existential search—indicating worldview insecurity—was hypothesized to predict increased physiological stress responses. Subjects included 50 university students who completed online questionnaires and took part in a standardized social stress test (Trier Social Stress Test). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP), heart rate (HR), and salivary cortisol (SC) were assessed at baseline, immediately after stress testing, and during a forty-minute recovery period. Worldview comparisons revealed lower cardiovascular stress responses among religious than among atheist and spiritual participants and particularly high baseline SC among spiritual participants. Across the entire sample, existential search showed substantial positive correlations with SBP, HR, and SC stress parameters. The findings suggest that worldview security might partly explain the health benefits often associated with religion.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Religious studies,General Medicine,General Nursing
Reference60 articles.
1. Atkinson, L., Gonzalez, A., Kashy, D. A., Basili, V., Masellis, M., Pereira, J., et al. (2013). Maternal sensitivity and infant and mother adrenocortical function across challenges. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38, 2943–2951. 2. Aune, D., Sen, A., ó’Hartaigh, B., Janszky, I., Romundstad, P. R., Tonstad, S., et al. (2017). Resting heart rate and the risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer, and all-cause mortality—a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, 27(6), 504–517. 3. Baker, J. O., Stroope, S., & Walker, M. H. (2018). Secularity, religiosity, and health: Physical and mental health differences between atheists, agnostics, and nonaffiliated theists compared to religiously affiliated individuals. Social Science Research, 75, 44–57. 4. Buggle, F., Bister, D., Nohe, G., Schneider, W., & Uhmann, K. (2000). Are atheists more depressed than religious people? Free Inquiry, 20, 50–55. 5. Chida, Y., & Steptoe, A. (2010). Greater cardiovascular responses to laboratory mental stress are associated with poor subsequent cardiovascular risk status: a meta-analysis of prospective evidence. Hypertension, 55(4), 1026–1032.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|