Systematizing modeler experience (MX) in model-driven engineering success stories

Author:

Kalantari Reyhaneh,Oertel Julian,Exelmans Joeri,Rukmono Satrio Adi,Amaral Vasco,Tichy Matthias,Juhnke Katharina,Steghöfer Jan-Philipp,Abrahão Silvia

Abstract

AbstractModeling is often associated with complex and heavy tooling, leading to a negative perception among practitioners. However, alternative paradigms, such as everything-as-code or low-code, are gaining acceptance due to their perceived ease of use. This paper explores the dichotomy between these perceptions through the lens of “modeler experience” (MX). MX includes factors such as user experience, motivation, integration, collaboration and versioning, and language complexity. We examine the relationships between these factors and their impact on different modeling usage scenarios. Our findings highlight the importance of considering MX when understanding how developers interact with modeling tools and the complexities of modeling and associated tooling.

Funder

Universitat Politècnica de València

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference42 articles.

1. Mussbacher, G., Amyot, D., Breu, R., Bruel, J.-M., Cheng, B.H., Collet, P., Combemale, B., France, R.B., Heldal, R., Hill, J., et al.: The relevance of model-driven engineering thirty years from now. In: Model-Driven Engineering Languages and Systems: 17th International Conference, MODELS 2014, Valencia, Spain, September 28–October 3, 2014. Proceedings 17, pp. 183–200. Springer (2014)

2. Whittle, J., Hutchinson, J.E., Rouncefield, M., Burden, H., Heldal, R.: Industrial adoption of model-driven engineering: are the tools really the problem? In: Moreira, A., Schätz, B., Gray, J., Vallecillo, A., Clarke, P.J. (eds.) Model-Driven Engineering Languages and Systems–16th International Conference, MODELS 2013, Miami, FL, USA, September 29–October 4, 2013. Proceedings. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 8107, pp. 1–17. Springer (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41533-3_1

3. Pourali, P.: Tooling advances inspired to address observed challenges of developing UML-like models when using modelling tools. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems: Companion Proceedings (2018)

4. Abrahão, S., Bordeleau, F., Cheng, B.H.C., Kokaly, S., Paige, R.F., Störrle, H., Whittle, J.: User experience for model-driven engineering: Challenges and future directions. In: 20th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, MODELS 2017, Austin, TX, USA, September 17–22, 2017, pp. 229–236. IEEE Computer Society (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/MODELS.2017.5

5. Kalantari, R., Lethbridge, T.C.: Unveiling developers’ mindset barriers to software modeling adoption. In: 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C), pp. 737–746 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/MODELS-C59198.2023.00120

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3