Foundations of information technology based on Bunge’s systemist philosophy of reality

Author:

Lukyanenko Roman,Storey Veda C.ORCID,Pastor OscarORCID

Abstract

AbstractGeneral ontology is a prominent theoretical foundation for information technology analysis, design, and development. Ontology is a branch of philosophy which studies what exists in reality. A widely used ontology in information systems, especially for conceptual modeling, is the BWW (Bunge–Wand–Weber), which is based on ideas of the philosopher and physicist Mario Bunge, as synthesized by Wand and Weber. The ontology was founded on an early subset of Bunge’s philosophy; however, many of Bunge’s ideas have evolved since then. An important question, therefore, is: do the more recent ideas expressed by Bunge call for a new ontology? In this paper, we conduct an analysis of Bunge’s earlier and more recent works to address this question. We present a new ontology based on Bunge’s later and broader works, which we refer to as Bunge’s Systemist Ontology (BSO). We then compare BSO to the constructs of BWW. The comparison reveals both considerable overlap between BSO and BWW, as well as substantial differences. From this comparison and the initial exposition of BSO, we provide suggestions for further ontology studies and identify research questions that could provide a fruitful agenda for future scholarship in conceptual modeling and other areas of information technology.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Modeling and Simulation,Software

Reference122 articles.

1. Agazzi, E.: Systemic thinking. In: Mario Bunge: A Centenary Festschrift (pp. 219–240). Springer (2019)

2. Alexander, C.: A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. Oxford University Press, New York (1977)

3. Anderson, M.R., Antenucci, D., Bittorf, V., Burgess, M., Cafarella, M.J., Kumar, A., Niu, F., Park, Y., Ré, C., Zhang, C.: Brainwash: a data system for feature engineering. In: CIDR 2013. CIDR 2013, Asilomar, CA (2013)

4. Batini, C., Rula, A., Scannapieco, M., Viscusi, G.: From data quality to big data quality. J. Database Manag. JDM 26(1), 60–82 (2015)

5. Becker, J., Bergener, P., Breuker, D., Rackers, M.: Evaluating the expressiveness of domain specific modeling languages using the Bunge–Wand–Weber ontology, pp. 1–10 (2010)

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Universal conceptual modeling: principles, benefits, and an agenda for conceptual modeling research;Software and Systems Modeling;2024-09-03

2. A survey of ontology-enabled processes for dependable robot autonomy;Frontiers in Robotics and AI;2024-07-10

3. A System Core Ontology for Capability Emergence Modeling;Lecture Notes in Computer Science;2023-10-20

4. Conceptual modelling for life sciences based on systemist foundations;BMC Bioinformatics;2023-06-13

5. Modeling 4.0: Conceptual Modeling in a Digital Era;Communications of the Association for Information Systems;2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3