Author:
Boers Klaus,Kaiser Florian,Schaerff Marcus,Wikström Per-Olof H.
Abstract
AbstractThe study of sanctioning effects has a rich history in deterrence and labeling theory. Most analyses have only used official data to study these effects. Yet, some more recent studies indicate that it is necessary to investigate self-reported as well as official data since it appears that sanctioning has differential effects on self-reported delinquency and formal control interventions. The current study contributes to this small body of research by using propensity score matching to analyze panel data from an ongoing English (Peterborough Adolescent and Young Adult Developmental Study) and a German (Crime in the modern City) study. We estimated average treatment effects of system contacts on both reoffending and subsequent contacts for juveniles living in Peterborough (ENG) and Duisburg (GER). Our findings are that (1) although official contacts have no substantial effects on the prevalence or versatility of reoffending, (2) they substantially increase the risk of a future formal contact. These results were almost identical at both sites, which may indicate a more general finding on the effects of formal control interventions.
Funder
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Life-span and Life-course Studies,Law,Applied Psychology
Reference69 articles.
1. Anwar, S., & Loughran, T. A. (2011). Testing a Bayesian learning theory of deterrence among serious juvenile offenders. Criminology, 49(3), 667–698.
2. Apel, R. J., & Sweeten, G. (2010). Propensity score matching in criminology and criminal justice. In A. R. Piquero & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative criminology (pp. 543–562). New York: Springer.
3. Barrick, K. (2014). A review of prior tests of labeling theory. In D. P. Farrington & J. Murray (Eds.), Labeling theory: Empirical tests (pp. 89–112). New Brunswick: Transaction.
4. Bateman, T. (2015). Trends in detected youth crime and contemporary state responses. In B. Goldson & J. Muncie (Eds.), Youth crime & justice (2nd ed., pp. 67–82). London: Sage.
5. Beardslee, J., Miltimore, S., Fine, A., Frick, P. J., Steinberg, L., & Cauffman, E. (2019). Under the radar or under arrest: How is adolescent boys’ first contact with the juvenile justice system related to future offending and arrests? Law and Human Behavior, 43(4), 342–357.