Abstract
Abstract
Overview
Reproductive experience (pregnancy and motherhood) leads to long-term changes in the neurobiological and hormonal features of anxiety in rats and humans. The aim of this study was to examine whether reproductive experience alters the effects of two pharmacological treatments for anxiety, a benzodiazepine (diazepam) and a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (fluoxetine), on animal models of anxiety.
Methods
In Experiment 1, virgin (n = 47) and age-matched mother (n = 50) rats at 1-month post-weaning were injected with diazepam (1.3 mg/kg or 1.7 mg/kg, i.p.) or vehicle, in the proestrus (high estradiol/progesterone/allopregnanolone) or metestrus (low estradiol/progesterone/allopregnanolone) phase of the estrous cycle 30 min prior to the elevated plus maze (EPM). In Experiment 2, virgin (n = 25) and mother rats (n = 20) were administered fluoxetine (10 mg/kg) or vehicle for 2 weeks prior to being tested on a Pavlovian fear conditioning and extinction protocol, and the EPM.
Results
Replicating past research, in virgin rats, the low dose of diazepam produced anxiolytic-like effects in proestrus, but only the high dose was anxiolytic-like in metestrus. In contrast, in mother rats, both doses of diazepam were anxiolytic-like irrespective of estrous phase. Fluoxetine produced anxiogenic-like effects in virgin rats during fear extinction and the EPM, but had no behavioural effects in mothers. In contrast, fluoxetine increased plasma corticosterone levels measured 30-min post-EPM in mothers, but not virgin rats.
Conclusions
Reproductive experience alters the dose responsivity and efficacy of common anti-anxiety medications in female rats. These findings highlight the importance of considering reproductive status in studies on anxiety and its treatment.
Funder
Australian Research Council Discovery Project
Australian Government
University of New South Wales
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference65 articles.
1. Agarwal SD, Landon BE (2019) Patterns in outpatient benzodiazepine prescribing in the United States. JAMA Netw Open 2(1):e187399. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7399
2. Beery AK, Zucker I (2011) Sex bias in neuroscience and biomedical research. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 35(3):565–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.07.002
3. Bekhbat M, Glasper ER, Rowson SA, Kelly SD, Neigh GN (2018) Measuring corticosterone concentrations over a physiological dynamic range in female rats. Physiol Behav 194:73–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.04.033
4. Bernstein L, Pike MC, Ross RK, Judd HL, Brown JB, Henderson BE (1985) Estrogen and sex hormone-binding globulin levels in nulliparous and parous women. J Natl Cancer Inst 74(4):741–745
5. Borsini F, Podhorna J, Marazziti D (2002) Do animal models of anxiety predict anxiolytic-like effects of antidepressants? Psychopharmacology 163(2):121–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-002-1155-6
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献