A formal approach for the construction and verification of railway control systems-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A formal approach for the construction and verification of railway control systems

Published:2011-03 Issue:2 Volume:23 Page:191-219
ISSN:0934-5043
Container-title:Formal Aspects of Computing
language:en
Short-container-title:Form. Asp. Comput.

Author:

Haxthausen Anne E.¹,Peleska Jan²,Kinder Sebastian²

Affiliation:

1. Department of Informatics and Mathematical Modelling, Technical University of Denmark, bld 321, 2800, Lyngby, Denmark

2. Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Universität Bremen, Bremen, Germany

Abstract

Abstract This paper describes a complete model-based development and verification approach for railway control systems. For each control system to be generated, the user makes a description of the application-specific parameters in a domain-specific language. This description is automatically transformed into an executable control system model expressed in SystemC. This model is then compiled into object code. Verification is performed using three main methods applied to different levels. (0) The domain-specific description is validated wrt. internal consistency by static analysis. (1) The crucial safety properties are verified for the SystemC model by means of bounded model checking. (2) The object code is verified to be I/O behaviourally equivalent to the SystemC model from which it was compiled.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Theoretical Computer Science,Software

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00165-009-0143-6.pdf

Reference40 articles.

1. Accellera (2004) Property specification language version 1.1

2. Berkenkötter K (2006) OCL-based validation of a railway domain profile. In: OCLApps 2006—OCL for (meta-)models in multiple application domains

3. Badban B Fränzle M Peleska J Teige T (2006) Test automation for hybrid systems. In: Proceedings of the third international Workshop on SOFTWARE QUALITY ASSURANCE (SOQUA 2006) Portland Oregon USA

4. Bjørner D George CW Stig Hansen B Laustrup H Prehn S (1997) A railway system coordination’97 case study workshop example. Technical Report 93 UNU/IIST P.O.Box 3058 Macau

5. Bjørner D (2003) Domain engineering: a “radical innovation” for Software and Systems Engineering? A Biased Account. In: Dershowitz N (ed) The Zohar Manna international symposium on “verification: theory & practice”. Springer Heidelberg Germany July 2003

Cited by 41 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. OnTrack: Reflecting on domain specific formal methods for railway designs;Science of Computer Programming;2024-03

2. iStar Goal Model to Z Formal Model Translation and Model Checking of CBTC Moving Block Interlocking System;Formal Aspects of Computing;2023-11-27

3. JMLKelinci+: Detecting Semantic Bugs and Covering Branches with Valid Inputs using Coverage-Guided Fuzzing and Runtime Assertion Checking;Formal Aspects of Computing;2023-08-05

4. A Case in Point: Verification and Testing of a EULYNX Interface;Formal Aspects of Computing;2023-03-16

5. Time for Traffic Manoeuvres;Lecture Notes in Computer Science;2023