Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage versus sigmoidectomy for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis: three-year follow-up of the randomised LOLA trial

Author:

Hoek Vincent T.ORCID,Edomskis Pim P.ORCID,Stark Pieter W.,Lambrichts Daniel P. V.,Draaisma Werner A.,Consten Esther C. J.,Lange Johan F.,Bemelman Willem A.,Hop W C,Opmeer B C,Reitsma J B,Scholte R A,Waltmann E W H,Legemate A,Bartelsman J F,Meijer D W,de Brouwer M,van Dalen J,Durbridge M,Geerdink M,Ilbrink G J,Mehmedovic S,Middelhoek P,Boom M J,Consten E C J,van der Bilt J D W,van Olden G D J,Stam M A W,Verweij M S,Vennix Sandra,Musters Gijsbert D,Swank Hilko A,Boermeester Marja A,Busch O R C,Buskens C J,El-Massoudi Y,Kluit A B,van Rossem C C,Schijven M P,Tanis P J,Unlu C,van Dieren Susan,Gerhards M F,Karsten T M,de Nes L C,Rijna H,van Wagensveld B A,Koff eman G I,Steller E P,Tuynman J B,Bruin S C,van der Peet D L,Blanken-Peeters C F J M,Cense H A,Jutte E,Crolla R M P H,van der Schelling G P,van Zeeland M,de Graaf E J R,Groenendijk R P R,Karsten T M,Vermaas M,Schouten O,de Vries M R,Prins H A,Lips D J,Bosker R J I,van der Hoeven J A B,Diks J,Plaisier P W,Kruyt P M,Sietses C,Stommel M W J,Nienhuijs S W,de Hingh I H J T,Luyer M D P,van Montfort G,Ponten E H,Smulders J F,van Duyn E B,Klaase J M,Swank D J,Ottow R T,Stockmann H B A C,Vermeulen J,Vuylsteke R J C L M,Belgers H J,Fransen S,von Meijenfeldt E M,Sosef M N,van Geloven A A W,Hendriks E R,ter Horst B,Leeuwenburgh M M N,van Ruler O,Vogten J M,Vriens E J C,Westerterp M,Eijsbouts Q A J,Bentohami A,Bijlsma T S,de Korte N,Nio D,Govaert M J P M,Joosten J J A,Tollenaar R A E M,Stassen L P S,Wiezer M J,Hazebroek E J,Smits A B,van Westreenen H L,Lange J F,Brandt A,Nijboer W N,Mulder Irene M,Toorenvliet B R,Weidema W F,Coene P P L O,Mannaerts G H H,den Hartog D,de Vos R J,Zengerink J F,Hoofwijk A G M,Hulsewé K W E,Melenhorst J,Stoot J H M B,Steup W H,Huijstee P J,Merkus J W S,Wever J J,Maring J K,Heisterkamp J,van Grevenstein W M U,Vriens M R,Besselink M G H,Borel Rinkes I H M,Witkamp A J,Slooter G D,Konsten J L M,Engel A F,Pierik E G J M,Frakking T G,van Geldere D,Patijn G A,D’Hoore Belgium A J L,de Buck A van Overstraeten,Miserez M,Terrasson I,Wolthuis A,di Saverio S,de Blasiis M G,

Abstract

Abstract Background This study aimed to compare laparoscopic lavage and sigmoidectomy as treatment for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis during a 36 month follow-up of the LOLA trial. Methods Within the LOLA arm of the international, multicentre LADIES trial, patients with perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis were randomised between laparoscopic lavage and sigmoidectomy. Outcomes were collected up to 36 months. The primary outcome of the present study was cumulative morbidity and mortality. Secondary outcomes included reoperations (including stoma reversals), stoma rates, and sigmoidectomy rates in the lavage group. Results Long-term follow-up was recorded in 77 of the 88 originally included patients, 39 were randomised to sigmoidectomy (51%) and 38 to laparoscopic lavage (49%). After 36 months, overall cumulative morbidity (sigmoidectomy 28/39 (72%) versus lavage 32/38 (84%), p = 0·272) and mortality (sigmoidectomy 7/39 (18%) versus lavage 6/38 (16%), p = 1·000) did not differ. The number of patients who underwent a reoperation was significantly lower for lavage compared to sigmoidectomy (sigmoidectomy 27/39 (69%) versus lavage 17/38 (45%), p = 0·039). After 36 months, patients alive with stoma in situ was lower in the lavage group (proportion calculated from the Kaplan–Meier life table, sigmoidectomy 17% vs lavage 11%, log-rank p = 0·0268). Eventually, 17 of 38 (45%) patients allocated to lavage underwent sigmoidectomy. Conclusion Long-term outcomes showed that laparoscopic lavage was associated with less patients who underwent reoperations and lower stoma rates in patients alive after 36 months compared to sigmoidectomy. No differences were found in terms of cumulative morbidity or mortality. Patient selection should be improved to reduce risk for short-term complications after which lavage could still be a valuable treatment option. Graphical abstract

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3