Online videos of robotic-assisted cholecystectomies: more harm than good?

Author:

Brian RileyORCID,Gomes Camilla,Alseidi Adnan,Jorge Irving,Malino Cris,Knauer Eric,Asbun Domenech,Deal Shanley B.,Soriano Ian

Abstract

Abstract Background Many surgeons use online videos to learn. However, these videos vary in content, quality, and educational value. In the setting of recent work questioning the safety of robotic-assisted cholecystectomies, we aimed (1) to identify highly watched online videos of robotic-assisted cholecystectomies, (2) to determine whether these videos demonstrate suboptimal techniques, and (3) to compare videos based on platform. Methods Two authors searched YouTube and a members-only Facebook group to identify highly watched videos of robotic-assisted cholecystectomies. Three members of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons Safe Cholecystectomy Task Force then reviewed videos in random order. These three members rated each video using Sanford and Strasberg’s six-point criteria for critical view of safety (CVS) scoring and the Parkland grading scale for cholecystitis. We performed regression to determine any association between Parkland grade and CVS score. We also compared scores between the YouTube and Facebook videos using a t test. Results We identified 50 videos of robotic-assisted cholecystectomies, including 25 from YouTube and 25 from Facebook. Of the 50 videos, six demonstrated a top-down approach. The remaining 44 videos received a mean of 2.4 of 6 points for the CVS score (SD = 1.8). Overall, 4 of the 50 videos (8%) received a passing CVS score of 5 or 6. Videos received a mean of 2.4 of 5 points for the Parkland grade (SD = 0.9). Videos on YouTube had lower CVS scores than videos on Facebook (1.9 vs. 2.8, respectively), though this difference was not significant (p = 0.09). By regression, there was no association between Parkland grade and CVS score (p = 0.13). Conclusion Publicly available and closed-group online videos of robotic-assisted cholecystectomy demonstrated inadequate dissection and may be of limited educational value. Future work should center on introducing measures to identify and feature videos with high-quality techniques most useful to surgeons. Graphical abstract

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference39 articles.

1. Rapp AK, Healy MG, Charlton ME, Keith JN, Rosenbaum ME, Kapadia MR (2016) YouTube is the most frequently used educational video source for surgical preparation. J Surg Educ 73(6):1072–1076

2. Curran V, Simmons K, Matthews L, Fleet L, Gustafson DL, Fairbridge NA et al (2020) YouTube as an educational resource in medical education: a scoping review. MedSciEduc 30(4):1775–1782

3. Bezner SK, Hodgman EI, Diesen DL, Clayton JT, Minkes RK, Langer JC et al (2014) Pediatric surgery on YouTube™: is the truth out there? J Pediatr Surg 49(4):586–589

4. Kliff S, Thomas K (2023) How a lucrative surgery took off online and disfigured patients. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/30/health/hernia-surgery-component-separation.html. Accessed 30 Oct 2023

5. Farr C (2019) Doctors are turning to YouTube to learn how to do surgical procedures, but there’s no quality control. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/24/doctors-are-watching-surgical-procedures-on-youtube.html. Accessed 24 Nov 2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3