Explainable artificial intelligence prediction-based model in laparoscopic liver surgery for segments 7 and 8: an international multicenter study
-
Published:2024-02-05
Issue:5
Volume:38
Page:2411-2422
-
ISSN:0930-2794
-
Container-title:Surgical Endoscopy
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Surg Endosc
Author:
Lopez-Lopez VictorORCID, Morise Zeniche, Albaladejo-González Mariano, Gavara Concepción Gomez, Goh Brian K. P., Koh Ye Xin, Paul Sijberden Jasper, Hilal Mohammed Abu, Mishima Kohei, Krürger Jaime Arthur Pirola, Herman Paulo, Cerezuela Alvaro, Brusadin Roberto, Kaizu Takashi, Lujan Juan, Rotellar Fernando, Monden Kazuteru, Dalmau Mar, Gotohda Naoto, Kudo Masashi, Kanazawa Akishige, Kato Yutaro, Nitta Hiroyuki, Amano Satoshi, Valle Raffaele Dalla, Giuffrida Mario, Ueno Masaki, Otsuka Yuichiro, Asano Daisuke, Tanabe Minoru, Itano Osamu, Minagawa Takuya, Eshmuminov Dilmurodjon, Herrero Irene, Ramírez Pablo, Ruipérez-Valiente José A., Robles-Campos Ricardo, Wakabayashi Go
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming more useful as a decision-making and outcomes predictor tool. We have developed AI models to predict surgical complexity and the postoperative course in laparoscopic liver surgery for segments 7 and 8.
Methods
We included patients with lesions located in segments 7 and 8 operated by minimally invasive liver surgery from an international multi-institutional database. We have employed AI models to predict surgical complexity and postoperative outcomes. Furthermore, we have applied SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to make the AI models interpretable. Finally, we analyzed the surgeries not converted to open versus those converted to open.
Results
Overall, 585 patients and 22 variables were included. Multi-layer Perceptron (MLP) showed the highest performance for predicting surgery complexity and Random Forest (RF) for predicting postoperative outcomes. SHAP detected that MLP and RF gave the highest relevance to the variables “resection type” and “largest tumor size” for predicting surgery complexity and postoperative outcomes. In addition, we explored between surgeries converted to open and non-converted, finding statistically significant differences in the variables “tumor location,” “blood loss,” “complications,” and “operation time.”
Conclusion
We have observed how the application of SHAP allows us to understand the predictions of AI models in surgical complexity and the postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic liver surgery in segments 7 and 8.
Funder
Universidad de Murcia
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference29 articles.
1. Liu PR, Lu L, Zhang JY, Huo TT, Liu SX, Ye ZW (2021) Application of artificial intelligence in medicine: an overview. Curr Med Sci 41(6):1105–1115 2. Antoniadi AM, Du Y, Guendouz Y, Wei L, Mazo C, Becker BA et al (2021) Current challenges and future opportunities for XAI in machine learning-based clinical decision support systems: a systematic review. Appl Sci 11(11):5088 3. Bihorac A, Ozrazgat-Baslanti T, Ebadi A, Motaei A, Madkour M, Pardalos PM et al (2019) MySurgeryRisk: development and validation of a machine-learning risk algorithm for major complications and death after surgery. Ann Surg 269(4):652–662 4. Giudicelli G, Poletti PA, Platon A, Marescaux J, Vix M, Diana M et al (2022) Development and validation of a predictive model for internal hernia after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in a multicentric retrospective cohort: the swirl, weight excess loss. Liq Score Ann Surg 275(6):1137–1142 5. Pfob A, Mehrara BJ, Nelson JA, Wilkins EG, Pusic AL, Sidey-Gibbons C (2023) Towards patient-centered decision-making in breast cancer surgery: machine learning to predict individual patient-reported outcomes at 1-year follow-up. Ann Surg 277(1):e144–e152
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|