Proctored adoption of robotic hiatus hernia surgery: outcomes and learning curves in a high-volume UK centre

Author:

Straatman JenniferORCID,Rahman Saqib A.,Carter Nicholas C.,Mercer Stuart J.,Knight Benjamin C.,van Boxel Gijsbert I.,Pucher Philip H.

Abstract

Abstract Background The adoption of new surgical technologies is inevitably accompanied by a learning curve. With the increasing adoption of robotic techniques in benign foregut surgery, it is imperative to define optimal learning pathways, to ensure a clinically safe introduction of such a technique. The aim of this study was to assess the learning curve for robotic hiatal hernia repair with a pre-defined adoption process and proctoring. Methods The learning curve was assessed in four surgeons in a high-volume tertiary referral centre, performing over a 100 hiatal hernia repairs annually. The robotic adoption process included simulation-based training and a multi-day wet lab-based course, followed by robotic operations proctored by robotic upper GI experts. CUSUM analysis was performed to assess changes in operating time in sequential cases. Results Each surgeon (A, B, C and D) performed between 22 and 32 cases, including a total of 109 patients. Overall, 40 cases were identified as ‘complex’ (36.7%), including 16 revisional cases (16/109, 14.7%). With CUSUM analysis inflection points for operating time were seen after 7 (surgeon B) to 15 cases (surgeon B). Conclusion The learning curve for robotic laparoscopic fundoplication may be as little as 7–15 cases in the setting of a clearly organized learning pathway with proctoring. By integrating these organized learning pathways learning curves may be shortened, ensuring patient safety, preventing detrimental outcomes due to longer learning curves, and accelerating adoption and integration of novel surgical techniques.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Surgery

Reference33 articles.

1. Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Cuesta MA, Daams F, Roig Garcia J, Bonavina L, Rosman C, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS, van der Peet DL (2017) Minimally invasive versus open esophageal resection: three-year follow-up of the previously reported randomized controlled trial: the TIME trial. Ann Surg 266:232–236. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002171

2. Memon MA, Yunus RM, Memon B, Awaiz A, Khan S (2018) A meta-analysis and systematic review of perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection (LARR) versus open rectal resection (ORR) for carcinoma. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 28:337–348. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000589

3. Hakkenbrak NAG, Jansma EP, van der Wielen N, van der Peet DL, Straatman J (2022) Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery 171:1552–1561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2021.11.035

4. Solaini L, Bocchino A, Avanzolini A, Annunziata D, Cavaliere D, Ercolani G (2022) Robotic versus laparoscopic left colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 37:1497–1507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-022-04194-8

5. Scarcella S, Castellani D, Gauhar V, Teoh JY-C, Giulioni C, Piazza P, Bravi CA, De Groote R, De Naeyer G, Puliatti S, Galosi AB, Mottrie A (2021) Robotic-assisted versus open simple prostatectomy: results from a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Investig Clin Urol 62:631–640. https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.20210297

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3