Abstract
Abstract
Background
A gap remains between the mounting evidence for single session management of bile duct stones and the adoption of this approach. Laparoscopic bile duct exploration (LBDE) is limited by the scarcity of training opportunities and adequate equipment and by the perception that the technique requires a high skill-set. The aim of this study was to create a new classification of difficulty based on operative characteristics and to stratify postoperative outcomes of easy vs. difficult LBDE irrespective of the surgeon’s experience.
Methods
A cohort of 1335 LBDEs was classified according to the location, number and size of ductal stones, the retrieval technique, utilisation of choledochoscopy and specific biliary pathologies encountered. A combination of features indicated easy (Grades I and II A & B) or difficult (Grades III A and B, IV and V) transcystic or transcholedochal explorations.
Results
78.3% of patients with acute cholecystitis or pancreatitis, 37% with jaundice and 46% with cholangitis had easy explorations. Difficult explorations were more likely to present as emergencies, with obstructive jaundice, previous sphincterotomy and dilated bile ducts on ultrasound scans. 77.7% of easy explorations were transcystic and 62.3% of difficult explorations transductal. Choledochoscopy was utilised in 23.4% of easy vs. 98% of difficult explorations. The use of biliary drains, open conversions, median operative time, biliary-related complications, hospital stay, readmissions, and retained stones increased with the difficulty grade. Grades I and II patients had 2 or more hospital episodes in 26.5% vs. 41.2% for grades III to V. There were 2 deaths in difficulty Grade V and one in Grade IIB.
Conclusion
Difficulty grading of LBDE is useful in predicting outcomes and facilitating comparison between studies. It ensures fair structuring and assessment of training and progress of the learning curve. LBDEs were easy in 72% with 77% completed transcystically. This may encourage more units to adopt this approach.
Graphical abstract
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference21 articles.
1. Internal Clinical Guidelines Team (UK) (2014). National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: clinical guidelines. Gallstone disease: diagnosis and management of cholelithiasis, cholecystitis and choledocholithiasis. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg188/evidence/full-guideline-pdf-193302253. Accessed Mar 2022
2. Overby DW, Apelgren KN, Richardson W, Fanelli R (2010) SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery. Surg Endosc 24:2368–2386
3. AUGIS/ASGBI J (2015) Pathway for the management of acute gallstone diseases. https://www.augis.org/Portals/0/Guidelines/Acute-Gallstones-Pathway-Final-Sept-2015.pdf. Accessed Mar 2022
4. Baucom R, Feurer I, Shelton J, Kummerow K, Holzman M, Poulose B (2016) Surgeons, ERCP, and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: do we need a standard approach for common bile duct stones? Surg Endosc 30(2):414–423
5. Sallam M, Nassar AHM, Kilpatrick R, Ali K (2021) A proposed difficulty grading system for laparoscopic bile duct exploration Benefits to practice and research. Br J Surg 108:znab429011. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znab429.011
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献