Author:
Bingener Juliane,Ghahfarokhi Leili Shahgholi,Skaran Pamela,Sloan Jeff
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference18 articles.
1. Korolija D, Sauerland S, Wood-Dauphinee S, Abbou CC, Eypasch E, Caballero MG, Lumsden MA, Millat B, Monson JRT, Nilsson G, Pointner R, Schwenk W, Shamiyeh A, Szold A, Targarona E, Ure B, Neugebauer E, European Association for Endoscopic S (2004) Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European association for endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 18:879–897
2. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Controlled Clin Trials 17:1–12
3. Higgins JPT, Altman DG (2007) Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley Blackwell, Chichester, England, pp 187–241
4. Efficace F, Bottomley A, Osoba D, Gotay C, Flechtner H, D’Haese S, Zurlo A (2003) Beyond the development of health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) measures: a checklist for evaluating HRQOL outcomes in cancer clinical trials–does HRQOL evaluation in prostate cancer research inform clinical decision making? J Clin Oncol 21:3502–3511
5. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:557–560
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献