Abstract
Abstract
Background
Endoscopic and laparoscopic electrosurgical devices (ED) are of great importance in modern medicine but can cause adverse events such as tissue injuries and burns from residual heat. While laparoscopic tools are well investigated, detailed insights about the temperature profile of endoscopic knives are lacking. Our aim is to investigate the temperature and the residual heat of laparoscopic and endoscopic monopolar instruments to increase the safety in handling ED.
Methods
An infrared camera was used to measure the temperature of laparoscopic and endoscopic instruments during energy application and to determine the cooling time to below 50 °C at a porcine stomach. Different power levels and cutting intervals were studied to investigate their impact on the temperature profile.
Results
During activation, the laparoscopic hook exceeded 120 °C regularly for an up to 10 mm shaft length. With regards to endoknives, only the Dual Tip Knife showed a shaft temperature of above 50 °C. The residual heat of the laparoscopic hook remained above 50 °C for at least 15 s after activation. Endoknives cooled to below 50 °C in 4 s. A higher power level and longer cutting duration significantly increased the shaft temperature and prolonged the cooling time (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
Residual heat and maximum temperature during energy application depend strongly on the chosen effect and cutting duration. To avoid potential injuries, the user should not touch any tissue with the laparoscopic hook for at least 15 s and with the endoknives for at least 4 s after energy application. As the shaft also heats up to over 120 °C, the user should be careful to avoid tissue contact during activation with the shaft. These results should be strongly considered for safety reasons when handling monopolar ED.
Funder
Else Kröner-Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technische Universität Dresden (TU Dresden), Dresden, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden an der Technischen Universität Dresden
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference27 articles.
1. Meeuwsen FC, Guédon ACP, Arkenbout EA, Van Der Elst M, Dankelman J, Van Den Dobbelsteen JJ (2017) The art of electrosurgery: trainees and experts. Surg Innov 24:373–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350617705207
2. O’Connor JL, Bloom DA (1996) William T Bovie and electrosurgery. Surgery 119:390–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6060(96)80137-1
3. History - Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH. https://de.erbe-med.com/de-en/company/history/. Accessed 27 July 2021
4. Bovie WT (1995) A preliminary note on a new surgical-current generator. Clin Orthop Relat Res 310:3–5
5. Baines RJ, Langelaan M, De Bruijne MC, Asscheman H, Spreeuwenberg P, Van De Steeg L, Siemerink KM, Van Rosse F, Broekens M, Wagner C (2013) Changes in adverse event rates in hospitals over time: a longitudinal retrospective patient record review study. BMJ Qual Saf 22:290–298. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001126
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献