Esophageal function and non-acid reflux evaluated by impedance-24 h-pH-metry, high-resolution manometry, and gastroscopy after one-anastomosis gastric bypass—outcomes of a prospective mid-term study
-
Published:2023-01-24
Issue:5
Volume:37
Page:3832-3841
-
ISSN:0930-2794
-
Container-title:Surgical Endoscopy
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Surg Endosc
Author:
Felsenreich D. M., Zach M. L., Vock N., Jedamzik J., Eichelter J., Mairinger M., Gensthaler L., Nixdorf L., Richwien P., Bichler C., Kristo I., Langer F. B., Prager G.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Background
One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) is the third most common bariatric operation for patients with obesity worldwide. One concern about OAGB is the presence of acid and non-acid reflux in a mid- and long-term follow-up. The aim of this study was to objectively evaluate reflux and esophagus motility by comparing preoperative and postoperative mid-term outcomes.
Setting
Cross-sectional study; University-hospital based.
Methods
This study includes primary OAGB patients (preoperative gastroscopy, high-resolution manometry (HRM), and impedance-24 h-pH-metry) operated at Medical University of Vienna before 31st December 2017. After a mean follow-up of 5.1 ± 2.3 years, these examinations were repeated. In addition, history of weight, remission of associated medical problems (AMP), and quality of life (QOL) were evaluated.
Results
A total of 21 patients were included in this study and went through all examinations. Preoperative weight was 124.4 ± 17.3 kg with a BMI of 44.7 ± 5.6 kg/m2, total weight loss after 5.1 ± 2.3 years was 34.4 ± 8.3%. In addition, remission of AMP and QOL outcomes were very satisfactory in this study. In gastroscopy, anastomositis, esophagitis, Barrett´s esophagus, and bile in the pouch were found in: 38.1%, 28.3%, 9.5%, and 42.9%. Results of HRM of the lower esophageal sphincter pressure were 28.0 ± 15.6 mmHg, which are unchanged compared to preoperative values. Nevertheless, in the impedance-24 h-pH-metry, acid exposure time and DeMeester score decreased significantly to 1.2 ± 1.2% (p = 0.004) and 7.5 ± 8.9 (p = 0.017). Further, the total number of refluxes were equal to preoperative; however, the decreased acid refluxes were replaced by non-acid refluxes.
Conclusion
This study has shown decreased rates of acid reflux and increased non-acid reflux after a mid-term outcome of primary OAGB patients. Gastroscopy showed signs of chronic irritation of the gastrojejunostomy, pouch, and distal esophagus, even in asymptomatic patients. Follow-up gastroscopies in OAGB patients after 5 years may be considered.
Graphical Abstract
Funder
EAES research grant Medical University of Vienna
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference39 articles.
1. Gensthaler L, Felsenreich DM, Jedamzik J, Eichelter J, Nixdorf L, Bichler C, Krebs M, Itariu B, Langer FB, Prager G (2022) Trends of overweight and Obesity in male adolescents: prevalence, socioeconomic status, and impact on cardiovascular risk in a central european country. Obes surg. 32(4):1024–1033 2. Peeters A, Barendregt JJ, Willekens F, Mackenbach JP, Al Mamun A, Bonneux L, Nedcom tNE, Demography Compression of Morbidity Research G (2003) Obesity in adulthood and its consequences for life expectancy: a life-table analysis. Ann Intern Med 138:24–32 3. Moreno Gijon M, Diaz Vico T, Rodicio Miravalles JL, Lopez-Negrete Cueto E, Suarez Sanchez A, Amoza Pais S, Sanz Navarro S, Valdes Arias C, Turienzo Santos EO, Sanz Alvarez LM (2020) Prospective analysis regarding health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) between morbid obese patients following bariatric surgery versus on a waiting list. Obes Surg 30:3054–3063 4. Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, Wolski K, Aminian A, Brethauer SA, Navaneethan SD, Singh RP, Pothier CE, Nissen SE, Kashyap SR, Investigators S (2017) Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes - 5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med 376:641–651 5. Carrano FM, Iossa A, Di Lorenzo N, Silecchia G, Kontouli KM, Mavridis D, Alarcon I, Felsenreich DM, Sanchez-Cordero S, Di Vincenzo A, Balague-Ponz MC, Batterham RL, Bouvy N, Copaescu C, Dicker D, Fried M, Godoroja D, Goitein D, Halford JCG, Kalogridaki M, De Luca M, Morales-Conde S, Prager G, Pucci A, Vilallonga R, Zani I, Vandvik PO, Antoniou SA, Group EBSG (2022) EAES rapid guideline: systematic review, network meta-analysis, CINeMA and GRADE assessment, and European consensus on bariatric surgery-extension 2022. Surg Endosc 36:1709–1725
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|