An international Delphi consensus for surgical quality assessment of lymphadenectomy and anastomosis in minimally invasive total gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Author:

Cizmic AmilaORCID,Romic Ivan,Balla Andrea,Barabino Nicolò,Anania Gabriele,Baiocchi Gian Luca,Bakula Branko,Balagué Carmen,Berlth Felix,Bintintan Vasile,Bracale Umberto,Egberts Jan-Hendrik,Fuchs Hans F.,Gisbertz Suzanne S.,Gockel Ines,Grimminger Peter,van Hillegersberg Richard,Inaki Noriyuki,Immanuel Arul,Korr Daniel,Lingohr Philipp,Mascagni Pietro,Melling Nathaniel,Milone Marco,Mintz Yoav,Morales-Conde Salvador,Moulla Yusef,Müller-Stich Beat P.,Nakajima Kiyokazu,Nilsson Magnus,Reeh Matthias,Sileri Pierpaolo,Targarona Eduardo M.,Ushimaru Yuki,Kim Young-Woo,Markar Sheraz,Nickel Felix,Mitra Anuja T.

Abstract

Abstract Background Minimally invasive total gastrectomy (MITG) is a mainstay for curative treatment of patients with gastric cancer. To define and standardize optimal surgical techniques and further improve clinical outcomes through the enhanced MITG surgical quality, there must be consensus on the key technical steps of lymphadenectomy and anastomosis creation, which is currently lacking. This study aimed to determine an expert consensus from an international panel regarding the technical aspects of the performance of MITG for oncological indications using the Delphi method. Methods A 100-point scoping survey was created based on the deconstruction of MITG into its key technical steps through local and international expert opinion and literature evidence. An international expert panel comprising upper gastrointestinal and general surgeons participated in multiple rounds of a Delphi consensus. The panelists voted on the issues concerning importance, difficulty, or agreement using an online questionnaire. A priori consensus standard was set at > 80% for agreement to a statement. Internal consistency and reliability were evaluated using Cronbach's α. Results Thirty expert upper gastrointestinal and general surgeons participated in three online Delphi rounds, generating a final consensus of 41 statements regarding MITG for gastric cancer. The consensus was gained from 22, 12, and 7 questions from Delphi rounds 1, 2, and 3, which were rephrased into the 41 statetments respectively. For lymphadenectomy and aspects of anastomosis creation, Cronbach’s α for round 1 was 0.896 and 0.886, and for round 2 was 0.848 and 0.779, regarding difficulty or importance. Conclusions The Delphi consensus defined 41 steps as crucial for performing a high-quality MITG for oncological indications based on the standards of an international panel. The results of this consensus provide a platform for creating and validating surgical quality assessment tools designed to improve clinical outcomes and standardize surgical quality in MITG.

Funder

European Association for Endoscopic Surgery and other Interventional Techniques

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE)

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3