Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Published:2004-12-09 Issue:2 Volume:19 Page:268-272
ISSN:0930-2794
Container-title:Surgical Endoscopy
language:en
Short-container-title:Surg Endosc

Author:

Adler S.,Scherrer M.,Rückauer K. D.,Daschner F. D.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Surgery

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-003-9232-4.pdf

Reference11 articles.

1. Reusable instruments are more cost-effective than disposable instruments for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

2. A cost comparison of disposable vs reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

3. Deutsches Institut fur Normung (1981) DIN 58946-3: Sterilization, Dampf-Sterilisatoren, Prüfung auf Wirksamkeit. Berlin, Erich Beuth Verlag, 1981 [German Institute for Standardization, DIN 58946-3: sterilization, steam sterilizers, examination on effectiveness]

Cited by 80 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Scoping review for the SAGES EAES joint collaborative on sustainability in surgical practice;Surgical Endoscopy;2024-08-22

2. Reducing personal protective equipment waste in the emergency department of a large regional hospital: codesign informed by system science;BMJ Public Health;2024-08

3. How to Run a Cost-Effective Operating Room;Hand Clinics;2024-08

4. Making minimally invasive procedures more sustainable: A systematic review comparing the environmental footprint of single‐use versus multi‐use instruments;World Journal of Surgery;2024-07-18

5. Sustainability in surgical practice: a collaborative call toward environmental sustainability in operating rooms;Surgical Endoscopy;2024-07-01